Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.
View Poll Results: Would you support lowered speed limits in your state?
Yes I would !
4
17.39%
No Way
17
73.91%
I don't know ? I have to think about it ?
2
8.70%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Drive Less, Live Longer ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:07 PM
  #11  
Blazed SS's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- July 2010
Monte Of The Month -- July 2013
IT HERTZ
3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,930
From: West Coast !!
5 Year Member
Default

I say no and lets just make it harder for stupid people to get driver licenses and put breathalyzers in all cars for when smart people get stupid
 
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #12  
Montess2k's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- January 2011
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,035
From: Staten Island, New York
Default

Getting jealous of the 65-70-75mph speedlimits

Joe
 
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #13  
Dyonysis's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 106
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Speeding laws have little effect. MOST people drive at a speed they consider safe, regardless of the limit. The remaining minority of driver's either a) religiously follow the posted limit all the time or b) speed excessively. Group 'B' are the one's who kill themselves and others.

There was actually a study from somewhere in Europe (wish I could find it again), where speeding laws are more liberal that showed no increase in accidents or deaths with higher limits. Put the limit to 100MPH on a windy road and most people won't drive it because they feel unsafe.

Low speed limits are a revenue source for the government. That is all.
 
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 09:29 PM
  #14  
bumpin96monte's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,460
15 Year Member
Default

I agree with what some have posted above- some people speed all the time, and a change in posted limit will have no effect other than on their ticket size.

There is no doubt that higher speeds yield worse crashes, in the kinetic energy formula- the velocity component is squared- so doubling your speed more than doubles the amount of energy you have. However, with lower speed limits, can we handle the extra traffic congestion? (and in that, might the number of accidents go up in some places from the extra congestion during lane changes and other maneuvers)

Personally, I don't ever speed regularly. If there is some pressing reason why I must- then I do; but I make it a habit not to speed (also helps that we have local speed cameras, and I don't like having to worry about my exact speed going through them in the mornings headed to work).

However, overall- I think if traffic safety is such a big concern; there are other ways to reduce the number of accidents. One would be providing more training for drivers- both initially, and maybe with re-certification testing and training.

Another would be becoming significantly more strict on drivers under the influence. I've personally absolutely had my fill of hearing about drunk drivers killing whole innocent families and such, and still frequently hear about people driving home drunk and thinking its 'cool'. Make even the first offense more strict than is worth it- would you still consider driving home drunk if the first offense were 15 days in jail and a $1000+ fine? The penalty should be stiff enough that people are scared to do it for fear of getting caught.

Also, drivers today are too distracted- messing with their phones while making calls; sending text messages, etc. Maybe they could initiate a push for all cars to be made with built in blue-tooth hands free devices or something? Also, drastically increase the fine for texting while driving so people get the point- if you're looking at the screen to see what you're typing or who you're texting, you're not paying attention to the road.

I just think there are a lot of traffic safety areas that could be addressed that will have just as much impact, if not more than, lowering the speed limit.
 
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 05:18 AM
  #15  
Space's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,585
From: Beach`in Florida
Default

...Thanks member's for your post/feedback/comments.
The majority of member's voted they do not want lower limits on speed.

I wonder why they make/produce vehicles to go over 200 MPH+ ? When we are all limited on how fast we can `go ? Where can you safely drive a vehicle over 130 + MPH ? Without risking your life or other's ?

Good Thing we don't have a Energy Crisis ?
It's a good thing we don't have a fuel shortage...Even though the US uses 1/3 of all fuel produced in our World ? We still want our 1000 + Horsepower rides We still get gas to feed our monster engines @ around $3 a gallon, while other countries are paying more then double the price...

We are a Hurry `Up and Wait Country.....& We want `it Now,
screw the future.....Are we spoiled ? Go `Speed

I confess: I am a violator, but I'm changing my views on many things during my time on
planet `Earth....4-$ure : )

Demand
The United States and Canada use oil more for transportation than for heat and ... (In most of the rest of the world, oil is more commonly used for space heating and ... Its consumption accounts for almost 45 percent of all oil use (see graph). ... The use of distillate fuel oil for home heating was once much more ...
www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/.../oil.../demand_text.htm - Cached - Similar
 

Last edited by Space; Jun 25, 2010 at 05:54 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BeachBumMike
Off Topic
45
Mar 16, 2010 08:45 PM
BeachBumMike
Off Topic
8
May 26, 2008 10:29 AM
BeachBumMike
Off Topic
17
Oct 5, 2007 09:23 PM
BeachBumMike
General Monte Carlo Talk
10
Apr 2, 2007 12:24 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.