General Monte Carlo Talk Talk about the Monte Carlo. Does not have to be your Monte. Can include pics and games.

leave it alone?

Old Aug 8, 2015 | 07:34 PM
  #1  
caltech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 15
From: ohio
Default leave it alone?

I have a 72 Monte that has basically sat for last 35 years,not even being started for the last 12. 63k on the clock.Was stored in a dry garage.I haven't attempted to start it yet,waiting on a new fuel tank.I was told this is a nylon coated timing gear?And they fail(the nylon)due to age.Replace it or leave it alone?I scoured the net,found nothing about the nylon.I don't want to get it in the engine if true.So if a tear down is in the works,do you just go ahead and pull the engine and install all new seals and gaskets?
 
Old Aug 8, 2015 | 07:40 PM
  #2  
ohara's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- April 2015
1 Year Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,052
From: Brockville Ontario
3 Year Member
Default

If the car hasn't been started for the last 12 years, it probably wouldn't hurt to replace the seals and gaskets and maybe put a bit of oil in the cylinders and crank it over if it will, sometimes they will seize up from sitting if there is any moisture in the cylinder walls they will rust, hopefully this is not the case, but wouldn't hurt to at least check things over before you fire it up.

nylon is similar to plastic and with age it will get brittle and could break so probably not worth taking the chance, it would be a shame to ruin the engine on start up
 
Old Aug 8, 2015 | 07:44 PM
  #3  
ohara's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- April 2015
1 Year Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,052
From: Brockville Ontario
3 Year Member
Default

Here is some reading for you with some pretty good tips for starting an engine that has been sitting

How to Start an Engine That's Been Sitting


5 Tips for Starting an Old Engine - HowStuffWorks


http://www.kaiserbill.com/Web-PDF/Start-Up.pdf
 
Old Aug 8, 2015 | 07:49 PM
  #4  
P343's Avatar

Monte of the Month -- February 2015
Monte Of The Month -- April 2017
1 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 6,949
From: Albany, Indiana
3 Year Member
Default

You can always try to move things a bit to see if it is seized by putting a big socket on the crank bolt and turning clockwise.
 
Old Aug 8, 2015 | 07:55 PM
  #5  
caltech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 15
From: ohio
Default

I just asked a Chevy guru,he says yes on the nylon gear.I am heading out to the garage and see if it is free.
 
Old Aug 9, 2015 | 11:00 AM
  #6  
caltech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 15
From: ohio
Default

The engine will roll over easily with a flexplate tool.I fogged it with WD and rolled it by hand(tool).Fresh oil and filter installed.I am considering a separate fuel container until new tank gets here.I really want to hear it run.The points appear to have a clean surface and plugs look great.Maybe get rid of the points and put a Pertonix in there?I know every time I get impatient,it comes back to haunt me.
 
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 04:45 PM
  #7  
caltech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 15
From: ohio
Default

The engine fired up after just a few rolls.No unusual noises and sounded great for a few minutes.It then got a rough idle and popping through the intake when revved up.I am afraid it lost a lobe off the camshaft.There appears to be 2 different camshafts available from GM for the L48 engine.The GM parts man is no help.My chevy guru neighbor says that one camshaft is for California emissions.It appears that the difference is in the closing of the valves before top dead center.One is 28 degree's,the other is 32.Anyone have any input on this?Called a leading cam manufacturer,the salesman wants to put a perf cam in it and frankly,didnt seem to know the answer to my question about those closing figures(even though they reproduce the factory grinds) and how it affects the engine and why.
 
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 05:16 PM
  #8  
P343's Avatar

Monte of the Month -- February 2015
Monte Of The Month -- April 2017
1 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 6,949
From: Albany, Indiana
3 Year Member
Default

Hmmm I wish I could help with this but I just went through this cam issue and got taken by a local engine builder I don't understand it well enough to give anyone advise.
I hope someone will post with some helpful information for you.
 
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 07:34 PM
  #9  
caltech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 15
From: ohio
Default

a little research says that one cam traps more compression on the later model open chamber head as used in 1971 and 72.the closed chamber head as used in 1970 had a much smaller combustion chamber and of course a higher compression ratio.it appears that the camshaft that closes further from top dead center traps more air.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Space
Off Topic
3
Dec 24, 2014 06:23 PM
SpinEm_90
Off Topic
31
Jan 21, 2011 10:24 AM
Space
Off Topic
7
Aug 16, 2008 09:40 AM
sirmarsh
General Monte Carlo Talk
24
Jul 25, 2007 11:30 AM
06BlackSS
General Monte Carlo Talk
9
Dec 13, 2006 07:57 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.