GOING LARGE IN BACK

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

#11

06-02-2008, 10:41 AM

shaboom5

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2006

Location: southington, ct

Posts: 65

RE: GOING LARGE IN BACK

Quote:

ORIGINAL: BankheadSS

well i thought u might have been talking about staggered fitment, thats what im going to run on my monte carlo once i return from iraq. i know for a fact that there are 3 people in atlanta that are running them, 2 of them with 22"s(candyred04, black07) and one with 20"s(red07). now listen to this on the 20's there 20x8.5 in the front and 20x10 in the rear.

[IMG]local://upfiles/2768/AB340CBB43DF4E54A61D6089B2A9E636.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/2768/C79739E4432B4523BCF32E893ADDAE01.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/2768/AAA677C1292F42298EBFA2912457D262.jpg[/IMG]

I love that look

you aren't wrong i was asking about both the staggered fitment and going for different sizes. I just wondered if anyone had done it before. I think a little while ago someone said they hated the front wheel drive vehicles because it seems like the rear tires get pulled into the wheel well.
I guess if you aren't worried about rotating tires.. staggered fitment looks great. I wonder how it drives.

#12

06-02-2008, 10:51 AM

shaboom5

Thread Starter

Join Date: May 2006

Location: southington, ct

Posts: 65

RE: GOING LARGE IN BACK

even in some of our sigs you can see it. at the top of the rear is about two inches in from the outside of the fender

#13

06-03-2008, 06:51 PM

mickey

Join Date: Apr 2005

Posts: 4,810

RE: GOING LARGE IN BACK

they look the same to me other then the actuall tire width.

this would be certantly a diffrent look.

when you say stagerd i was under the impression of running like a 18 up front and a 20 in the rear witch would give it a natrual rake to it.