06 Mustang Vs 01 Monte... who would win?
#16
RE: 06 Mustang Vs 01 Monte... who would win?
Now let's us examine the two vehciles is question:
Specifications
2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS
2007 Ford Mustang GT Premium
Exterior length
196.7 "
187.6 "
Exterior body width
72.9 "
74.0 "
Exterior height
55.8 "
54.5 "
Engine
5.3L V-8
4.6L V-8
Horsepower
303 @ 5,600 rpm
300 @ 5,750 rpm
Torque
323 @ 4,400 rpm
320 @ 4,500 rpm
Fuel economy - city
18 mpg
17 mpg
Fuel economy - highway
27 mpg
25 mpg
0-60mph (estimated)
5.8 seconds
5.8 seconds
1/4 mile (estimated)
14.7 seconds at 98 mph
14.0 seconds at 105 mph
Lateral acceleration (estimated)
.90 G
.89 G
Slalom (estimated)
60.8 mph
59.6 mph
Bore-and-Stroke
3.78 / 3.62 "
3.55 / 3.54 "
Curb weight
3,490 lbs.
N/A
Available:
3,532 lbs.
Maximum Trailer Weight
1,000 lbs.
1,000 lbs.
Wheelbase
110.5 "
107.1 "
Front track
62.4 "
62.3 "
Rear track
61.5 "
62.5 "
Turning radius
20.0 '
18.8 '
Drag coefficient
.36
N/A
From what I see, the Monte Carlo SS V8 Should(Proven by myself on numerous occassions) to beat the Mustang GT... Although this information shows the Mustang with a better quarter mile time... Puzzling... I weigh 300-lbs, 6'0".. Basically a Big'o'Fat Boy... and I whoop on the skinny Mustang Drivers all the time... So.. My Mama must have been driving the Monte Carlo SS during that time trial, because that was no... real driver!
Exterior height
Engine
Horsepower
Torque
Fuel economy - city
Fuel economy - highway
0-60mph (estimated)
5.8 seconds
5.8 seconds
1/4 mile (estimated)
14.7 seconds at 98 mph
14.0 seconds at 105 mph
Lateral acceleration (estimated)
.90 G
.89 G
Slalom (estimated)
60.8 mph
59.6 mph
Bore-and-Stroke
3.78 / 3.62 "
3.55 / 3.54 "
Curb weight
3,490 lbs.
Standard:
3,483 lbs.
N/A
Available:
3,532 lbs.
Maximum Trailer Weight
1,000 lbs.
1,000 lbs.
Wheelbase
110.5 "
107.1 "
Front track
62.4 "
Rear track
Turning radius
Drag coefficient
Specifications
2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS
2007 Ford Mustang GT Premium
Exterior length
196.7 "
187.6 "
Exterior body width
72.9 "
74.0 "
Exterior height
55.8 "
54.5 "
Engine
5.3L V-8
4.6L V-8
Horsepower
303 @ 5,600 rpm
300 @ 5,750 rpm
Torque
323 @ 4,400 rpm
320 @ 4,500 rpm
Fuel economy - city
18 mpg
17 mpg
Fuel economy - highway
27 mpg
25 mpg
0-60mph (estimated)
5.8 seconds
5.8 seconds
1/4 mile (estimated)
14.7 seconds at 98 mph
14.0 seconds at 105 mph
Lateral acceleration (estimated)
.90 G
.89 G
Slalom (estimated)
60.8 mph
59.6 mph
Bore-and-Stroke
3.78 / 3.62 "
3.55 / 3.54 "
Curb weight
3,490 lbs.
N/A
Available:
3,532 lbs.
Maximum Trailer Weight
1,000 lbs.
1,000 lbs.
Wheelbase
110.5 "
107.1 "
Front track
62.4 "
62.3 "
Rear track
61.5 "
62.5 "
Turning radius
20.0 '
18.8 '
Drag coefficient
.36
N/A
From what I see, the Monte Carlo SS V8 Should(Proven by myself on numerous occassions) to beat the Mustang GT... Although this information shows the Mustang with a better quarter mile time... Puzzling... I weigh 300-lbs, 6'0".. Basically a Big'o'Fat Boy... and I whoop on the skinny Mustang Drivers all the time... So.. My Mama must have been driving the Monte Carlo SS during that time trial, because that was no... real driver!
Exterior height
Engine
Horsepower
Torque
Fuel economy - city
Fuel economy - highway
0-60mph (estimated)
5.8 seconds
5.8 seconds
1/4 mile (estimated)
14.7 seconds at 98 mph
14.0 seconds at 105 mph
Lateral acceleration (estimated)
.90 G
.89 G
Slalom (estimated)
60.8 mph
59.6 mph
Bore-and-Stroke
3.78 / 3.62 "
3.55 / 3.54 "
Curb weight
3,490 lbs.
Standard:
3,483 lbs.
N/A
Available:
3,532 lbs.
Maximum Trailer Weight
1,000 lbs.
1,000 lbs.
Wheelbase
110.5 "
107.1 "
Front track
62.4 "
Rear track
Turning radius
Drag coefficient
#18
RE: 06 Mustang Vs 01 Monte... who would win?
Here's some info I got from cars.com
2001 Monte Carlo 3400
Engine Displacement: 205 cu.in.
Horse Power: 180-hp @ 5200 rpm
Torque: 205 lbs.-ft. @ 4000 rpm
Valvetrain: OHV
Valves: 12
Engine bore x stroke: 3.6" x 3.3"
Compression ratio: 9.50 to 1
Curb weight: 3340 lbs.
Exterior length: 197.9"
Exterior width: 72.3"
Exterior height: 55.2"
Wheel base: 110.5"
2006 Mustang 4.0 litre V6
Engine Displacement: 245 cu.in.
Horsepower: 210-hp @ 5300 rpm
Torque: 240 lbs.ft. @ 3500
Valvetrain: SOHC
Valves: 12
Engine bore x stroke: 4.0" x 3.3"
Compression ratio: 9.70 to 1
Curb weight: 3351 lbs.
Exterior length: 187.6"
Exterior width: 74.0"
Exterior height: 54.5"
Wheelbase: 107.1"
0-60 mph: 6.98 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.39 seconds @ 93.85 mph
Lateral acceleration: 0.82 g
Slalom: 59 mph
Sorry I couldn't get the performance times for the Monte, but like you pointed out, yours is modded anyway. Hope this helps.
2001 Monte Carlo 3400
Engine Displacement: 205 cu.in.
Horse Power: 180-hp @ 5200 rpm
Torque: 205 lbs.-ft. @ 4000 rpm
Valvetrain: OHV
Valves: 12
Engine bore x stroke: 3.6" x 3.3"
Compression ratio: 9.50 to 1
Curb weight: 3340 lbs.
Exterior length: 197.9"
Exterior width: 72.3"
Exterior height: 55.2"
Wheel base: 110.5"
2006 Mustang 4.0 litre V6
Engine Displacement: 245 cu.in.
Horsepower: 210-hp @ 5300 rpm
Torque: 240 lbs.ft. @ 3500
Valvetrain: SOHC
Valves: 12
Engine bore x stroke: 4.0" x 3.3"
Compression ratio: 9.70 to 1
Curb weight: 3351 lbs.
Exterior length: 187.6"
Exterior width: 74.0"
Exterior height: 54.5"
Wheelbase: 107.1"
0-60 mph: 6.98 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.39 seconds @ 93.85 mph
Lateral acceleration: 0.82 g
Slalom: 59 mph
Sorry I couldn't get the performance times for the Monte, but like you pointed out, yours is modded anyway. Hope this helps.
#20
RE: 06 Mustang Vs 01 Monte... who would win?
I've been up against a few v6 Mustangs in my 02 SSand it was close, however I almost never seem to come out on top. It's hard to get that break off the linewith anautomatic tranny.