Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Review-Do you agree?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-12-2015, 10:40 AM
P343's Avatar

Monte of the Month -- February 2015
Monte Of The Month -- April 2017
3 Year Member
1 Year Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Albany, Indiana
Posts: 6,949
Default Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Review-Do you agree?

Do you agree with this review? Post your thoughts below

Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Review

By Robert Farago on November 28, 2003
There's something slightly odd about testing a car called an "SS". While petrolheads may know that Chevrolet uses the letters to indicate a "Super Sports" derivative, it's hard not to wonder how many SS models are bought by German-speaking Argentineans. Anyway, just in case I wanted to maintain a low profile whilst driving a Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS past my local synagogue, GM kindly delivered a press car painted in "Competition Yellow".
No matter. Even in kindergarten-friendly hues, the SS' shape lacks charisma. It's best viewed from the side, where cleverly-placed swage lines accentuate balanced proportions. From the front, nothing. The rear transports us to the 70's, when safety legislation triggered a plague of bulbous bumper grafts. Overall, Monte's anodyne design projects less visual aggression than a tuned Honda – never mind its hairy-chested ancestors.
The SS' interior offers a more direct link to the past; a time when rotary ***** and plastic sliders controlled all ergonomic functions. Actually, ***** and sliders are an excellent way to tweak graduated systems at speed. It's just that Monte's switchgear is fashioned from black, pre-disco plastic; a substance so nasty even vinyl would be a welcome upgrade. The test car's cabin had all the gizmology of a modern car – XM radio, On Star, power this and that – with none of the soft touch sensuality, backlit fun or technological flair of its Japanese rivals.
What the SS does have is "lebensraum" (living space). Unlike the competition, Monte is a full-sized coupe for full-sized drivers and two of their full-sized American friends. The seats may provide the same lateral support as a museum bench, but they're comfortable enough for all but the extremely obese or chronically tall. Maybe that's why the steering wheel wouldn't seem out of place in a bus. On the positive side, the elbow friendly dimensions yield an important safety benefit: a five-star front impact rating.
Ah, but who cares about such sensible concerns as life or death when you've got a bad *** V8 rumbling in the engine bay? If only. The Monte Carlo SS is powered by a 3.8 litre supercharged V6. The Series II (L65) power plant is mechanical sacrilege. Lest we forget, the original SS, the 1961 Chevrolet Impala SS, sported a 409 cubic inch V8. It was so powerful (360hp) that its capacity was immortalized by The Beach Boys in their hit song "409".
GM's decision to give the Monte Carlo SS a 231 cubic inch V6 is even more baffling when you consider the V8-powered monsters wearing the Monte Carlo badge currently competing for NASCAR glory. I mean, the late, great Dale Earnhardt drove a Monte Carlo! Surely, there was a suitably compact engine somewhere in the secret store room of GM's Performance Division… Mind you, Monte's super six is a feisty little thing. Roust the car's lag-free supercharger and the engine generates more than merely adequate peak power: 240hp at 5200rpm. Better still, there's plenty of torque underfoot: 280 lb-ft at 2600rpms. No matter where you happen to be in the power band when you plant your foot in the carpet, the car's cast iron lump responds to the slightest throttle input with immediate urge.
It's too bad the Monte Carlo SS can't take full advantage of its horses. Floor it and you'll instantly understand why traditional muscle cars steer with one set of wheels and propel with the other. The front wheel drive – yes, front – Monte Carlo SS responds to any serious command from the engine room by spinning its front wheels. Even with the traction control engaged, speed freaks will find the resulting lack of directional control and forward progress most annoying.
That said, once you identify the outer edge of the thrust – adhesion equation (taking account of loose rocks, greasy surfaces and/or moisture) you can drive Monte at what you Brits call "a fair old whack". The car's chassis, Goodyear tyres and four-corner independent suspension are a marvel. The set-up effortlessly cushions surface imperfections while delivering superb body control. Once underway, the power-assisted brakes are mushy but effective. The power-assisted rack and pinion steering is equally numb, equally effective. All things considered, a good driver could exploit Monte's "easy does it" power curve to maintain sufficient momentum and attain some significant speed. But who could be bothered? You'd be driving fast in spite of Monte's character, not because of it.
Bottom line: the Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS is no sports car. Two-hundred and forty horses says it ain't no muscle car neither. Still, thanks to its user-friendly handling, Monte does have a purpose. Provided you don't mind driving a machine with a rental car quality interior, the Monte is an ideal relaxed cruiser. Bumble along with a few mates, save the extra power for overtaking maneuvers, and you will not be disappointed. Until, that is, GM releases the rear-wheel-drive, 350hp Pontiac GTO … aka the Holden Monaro.
 
  #2  
Old 03-12-2015, 10:47 AM
Leprechaun93's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- June 2013
Monte Of The Month -- December 2015
5 Year Member
3 Year Member1 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Middletown, NY
Posts: 10,385
Default

I'll agree with the interior, my 97 monte had a nicer interior lol. Reviews are never that kind to these cars, sure wish they were rwd, sure we wish they had v8's.
 
  #3  
Old 03-12-2015, 11:35 AM
P343's Avatar

Monte of the Month -- February 2015
Monte Of The Month -- April 2017
3 Year Member
1 Year Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Albany, Indiana
Posts: 6,949
Default

Originally Posted by Leprechaun93
Reviews are never that kind to these cars, sure wish they were rwd, sure we wish they had v8's.
I agree!!

JC will like that review with all the pics of the yellow car!!!
 

Last edited by P343; 03-12-2015 at 11:37 AM.
  #4  
Old 03-12-2015, 01:45 PM
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Whitby, Ontario
Posts: 302
Default

He's right about a few things.
I have the 06 SS, V8 FWD.


Doesn't qualify as a muscle car. Too big and heavy and FWD, doesn't make it as a sports car. It's never gonna be a Race car.


But it's the best dam Hwy Cruiser you could ever want. Way more comfy for long cruises than my Camaro.


and yes, it coulda used digital control on the dual zone temperature control.
 
  #5  
Old 03-12-2015, 08:59 PM
Leprechaun93's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- June 2013
Monte Of The Month -- December 2015
5 Year Member
3 Year Member1 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Middletown, NY
Posts: 10,385
Default

I actually prefer non digital climate control, just a dial with red and blue is fine. With numbers i actually have to sit there and think about what temperature i want, too complicated
 
  #6  
Old 03-13-2015, 12:41 AM
JC Colon's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- May 2014
5 Year Member
3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kent, Wa.
Posts: 2,405
Default

Barb is right! I do like all the pics of the Competition Yellow Monte!
I like the non digital climate control as well. The author said there is plenty of space for a good sized driver and 2 of his mates? What did he have in the 4th seat and the space in between? I've had, although I don't like to, 5 people including myself in My Minion, ONCE! I stand at a good 5'11" and my legs are longer than my torso. We all were comfortable for the 5 mile drive. The trunk is just as spacious. My 3800 Series II is not a power house, but it's got what I need to keep me happy. I didn't buy the car to Race, I bought her to Drive/Cruise. And if I do want more power, I can add a super charger and do a top switch or swap I a V8. 240 hp with a little more torque would be nice.
As for the Exterior, My Minion has a Custom Aggressive like due to the Monte emblems moved to the doors and the 2" Rear lift. Add that and the 245/45r18s and you have an aggressive look from the rear. For the front, the addition of Black Euro Headlight Housings, a Double Nostrilled Hood and the mirrors
from a Grand Prix of the same generation, and wala, she's aggressive from the front as well. These and other cosmetic mods I want to do is because I want My Minion to Look a little different from Jon Doe's Yellow Monte! That's my signature!
I think the designers of the 5th gen G Body had us Mod Guys in mind. The stock platform is a nice Car. It keeps with the progression from the 1st gen to the 6th. The Monte, the Camaro and the Corvette are the only 3 cars in GMs line up that kept the styling lines and size of the original cars of the same name plates.
Although the Monte was used for Pro racing, the street car was never really a race car. In each version of the car you had to swap out the engine and beef up the Trans and suspension for some good power and throttle response.
The Europeans want cars they can run around their small curvy streets at Mock II speeds. In America the emphasis is on Fuel ecconomy. For a Full Sized Coupe, the Monte gets pretty good City mileage and Very Good Hi Way mileage. It's an American Car made for American needs.
And I Love my Competition Yellow Minion! So to the author of this article, I say "Bug Off"
 

Last edited by JC Colon; 03-13-2015 at 12:51 AM.
  #7  
Old 03-13-2015, 05:23 AM
P343's Avatar

Monte of the Month -- February 2015
Monte Of The Month -- April 2017
3 Year Member
1 Year Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Albany, Indiana
Posts: 6,949
Default

I knew you would like those yellow cars as soon as I saw the article!!
 
  #8  
Old 03-13-2015, 07:35 AM
JC Colon's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- May 2014
5 Year Member
3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kent, Wa.
Posts: 2,405
Default

I also like that the author didn't say anything negative about the color!
 
  #9  
Old 03-13-2015, 12:48 PM
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: nova scotia
Posts: 139
Default

is what it is ....bought mine cuz I liked it.....not looking for speed or rumble....just a nice cruiser which it turned out to be......bot the comp\yellow will turn heads. My Mustang is for tearin up ashpalt, makin' a racket and being a teenager again LOL
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Space
General Monte Carlo Talk
11
06-10-2012 11:39 PM
MillerMonteSS
MCF Website Problems & Issues
28
02-01-2011 04:59 PM
Space
General Monte Carlo Talk
2
03-07-2010 04:22 PM
One Dark SS
Off Topic
11
06-20-2009 04:02 AM
Mrrench
NASCAR Racing
4
04-26-2007 03:25 AM



Quick Reply: Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Review-Do you agree?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.