Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

2009 Malibu vs. 1959 Bel Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 10-02-2009, 09:10 AM
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gardner, KS., USA
Posts: 445
Default Big Difference between '59 & '65...

There was a big Difference in the Frame of a '59 & the new version of '65!
I know -as I "treeded" a '65 SS (street racing. I'm bad.) after thrashing a
Camaro. I was trying to slow down & the '65 went into a "shimmie" & I did
about (3) 360's before hitting an Oak tree dead on @ apx. 85 mph...

Well, the tree hit me back afterwards! I lived to tell & survived w/a cut
on the head. The Oak Tree didn't make it! Didn't even fracture the
windshield. I did have a factory Lap safety belt on.

I rebuilt the '65 & it came out even better! I think the test w/'65 would come out much different as the ole' '59 had the X frame -which gave you no protection on the side of the car.

Wonder what would happend if they tested the '09 Boo against a '76
Impala w/the Big Honkin' Bumpers ? You could have a Picnic on those
bumpers.

 
  #32  
Old 10-02-2009, 09:49 AM
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- August 2014
15 Year Member
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southeast PA
Posts: 25,136
Default

I guess we'll see in 15 years? :P
 
  #33  
Old 10-02-2009, 11:19 AM
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gardner, KS., USA
Posts: 445
Default In 6 years...

Originally Posted by chibiblacksheep
I guess we'll see in 15 years? :P
6 years. If They do that to an Impala in 2015 - I will be on the phone
(If we have them then...) calling someone!

Mike: How are you doing?

-Mark.
 
  #34  
Old 10-02-2009, 11:24 AM
rj's Avatar
rj
rj is offline
15 Year Member
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southwestern OH
Posts: 6,482
Default

Originally Posted by JJsRYD
45 mph

It was considered a sin to go faster then 35mph in 1909.
(you think I'm joking don't you? and no.......... I wasn't there to personally know this info) lol
 
  #35  
Old 10-02-2009, 11:28 AM
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- August 2014
15 Year Member
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southeast PA
Posts: 25,136
Default

Me?

I'm doing good
 
  #36  
Old 10-02-2009, 03:12 PM
skylark65's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- September 2009
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bushkill, PA
Posts: 3,279
Default

i just hope that the damn saftey people ( i dont remember who taz said they are) dont turn this moron test into a yearly ritual.... think im pissed now? i think i'd make national headlines with what i would do to anyone who thinks this is a "good test".... its not, because it does not put the car in a realistic situation.... wanna run a malibu into a prius ( prius had those faulty brakes, lol) or a mack truck go right ahead, but i do beleive that little "stunt" was designed with sales in mind....
 
  #37  
Old 10-02-2009, 04:07 PM
Taz's Avatar
Taz
Taz is offline

Monte Of The Month -- March 2014
15 Year Member
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Windsor
Posts: 18,646
Default

It was the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
 
  #38  
Old 10-02-2009, 06:25 PM
skylark65's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- September 2009
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bushkill, PA
Posts: 3,279
Default

yha, thats the one!

im just sooooo glad that they are proving im going to be safe in my new malibu sedan if i ever head on one of those old, heavy, gas guzzeling, emissions spewing, and downright EVIL 59 chevys! i just HATE those damn classic car buffs & their want to " preserve" those unsafe hazards on wheels.... oh, btw, i just found out im adopted & my real dad is ralph nader lol.
 
  #39  
Old 10-02-2009, 06:33 PM
The Popcorn King's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- July 2009
I'M NOT OLD, I'M JUST WELL MARINATED.
5 Year Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 6,996
Default

Originally Posted by skylark65
oh, btw, i just found out im adopted & my real dad is ralph nader lol.
I knew there was something ODD about you. LOL

 
  #40  
Old 10-02-2009, 06:34 PM
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Newberry, SC
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by rj
Next let's talk a collapsing steering column. So the driver won't be impaled in the vent of a front end crash.

Shock absorbers in the front bumper to absorb part of the front end collision. Sure a 50lb all steel bumper is going to provide protection a plastic bumper won't. If the '59 bumper had the same absorbers mounted to it the '09 bumper has I'll bet the '59 bumper will proect you better then they want you to be aware of.

The '59 Chevy is also mounted to a fairly new for it's time designed frame. Like the '58 the frame is prone to twist because it's made in an X design. Mount the '59 body even to a 1988 Monte frame and I'll bet side impact protection just improved 100%.
And lets not forget the fuzzy dice hanging from the mirror!!!! The damn fuzzy dice are the real killers! :p

Seriously it is sad that they felt that we really weren't aware of how much safer new cars are.
 


Quick Reply: 2009 Malibu vs. 1959 Bel Air



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.