General Monte Carlo Talk Talk about the Monte Carlo. Does not have to be your Monte. Can include pics and games.

> > Monte Carlo Reviews < <

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 05-01-2014 | 12:27 PM
BeachBumMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,095
From: SpaceCoast, Florida
Lightbulb >The Truth About Cars: 2003 Monte Carlo Review<

The Truth About Cars | Car Reviews | Chevrolet
Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Review


By Robert Farago on November 28, 2003 There's something slightly odd about testing a car called an "SS". While petrolheads may know that Chevrolet uses the letters to indicate a "Super Sports" derivative, it's hard not to wonder how many SS models are bought by German-speaking Argentineans. Anyway, just in case I wanted to maintain a low profile whilst driving a Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS past my local synagogue, GM kindly delivered a press car painted in "Competition Yellow".
No matter. Even in kindergarten-friendly hues, the SS' shape lacks charisma. It's best viewed from the side, where cleverly-placed swage lines accentuate balanced proportions. From the front, nothing. The rear transports us to the 70's, when safety legislation triggered a plague of bulbous bumper grafts. Overall, Monte's anodyne design projects less visual aggression than a tuned Honda – never mind its hairy-chested ancestors.
The SS' interior offers a more direct link to the past; a time when rotary ***** and plastic sliders controlled all ergonomic functions. Actually, ***** and sliders are an excellent way to tweak graduated systems at speed. It's just that Monte's switchgear is fashioned from black, pre-disco plastic; a substance so nasty even vinyl would be a welcome upgrade. The test car's cabin had all the gizmology of a modern car – XM radio, On Star, power this and that – with none of the soft touch sensuality, backlit fun or technological flair of its Japanese rivals.
What the SS does have is "lebensraum" (living space). Unlike the competition, Monte is a full-sized coupe for full-sized drivers and two of their full-sized American friends. The seats may provide the same lateral support as a museum bench, but they're comfortable enough for all but the extremely obese or chronically tall. Maybe that's why the steering wheel wouldn't seem out of place in a bus. On the positive side, the elbow friendly dimensions yield an important safety benefit: a five-star front impact rating.
Ah, but who cares about such sensible concerns as life or death when you've got a bad *** V8 rumbling in the engine bay? If only. The Monte Carlo SS is powered by a 3.8 litre supercharged V6. The Series II (L65) power plant is mechanical sacrilege. Lest we forget, the original SS, the 1961 Chevrolet Impala SS, sported a 409 cubic inch V8. It was so powerful (360hp) that its capacity was immortalized by The Beach Boys in their hit song "409".
GM's decision to give the Monte Carlo SS a 231 cubic inch V6 is even more baffling when you consider the V8-powered monsters wearing the Monte Carlo badge currently competing for NASCAR glory. I mean, the late, great Dale Earnhardt drove a Monte Carlo! Surely, there was a suitably compact engine somewhere in the secret store room of GM's Performance Division… Mind you, Monte's super six is a feisty little thing. Roust the car's lag-free supercharger and the engine generates more than merely adequate peak power: 240hp at 5200rpm. Better still, there's plenty of torque underfoot: 280 lb-ft at 2600rpms. No matter where you happen to be in the power band when you plant your foot in the carpet, the car's cast iron lump responds to the slightest throttle input with immediate urge.
It's too bad the Monte Carlo SS can't take full advantage of its horses. Floor it and you'll instantly understand why traditional muscle cars steer with one set of wheels and propel with the other. The front wheel drive – yes, front – Monte Carlo SS responds to any serious command from the engine room by spinning its front wheels. Even with the traction control engaged, speed freaks will find the resulting lack of directional control and forward progress most annoying.
That said, once you identify the outer edge of the thrust – adhesion equation (taking account of loose rocks, greasy surfaces and/or moisture) you can drive Monte at what you Brits call "a fair old whack". The car's chassis, Goodyear tyres and four-corner independent suspension are a marvel. The set-up effortlessly cushions surface imperfections while delivering superb body control. Once underway, the power-assisted brakes are mushy but effective. The power-assisted rack and pinion steering is equally numb, equally effective. All things considered, a good driver could exploit Monte's "easy does it" power curve to maintain sufficient momentum and attain some significant speed. But who could be bothered? You'd be driving fast in spite of Monte's character, not because of it.
Bottom line: the Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS is no sports car. Two-hundred and forty horses says it ain't no muscle car neither. Still, thanks to its user-friendly handling, Monte does have a purpose. Provided you don't mind driving a machine with a rental car quality interior, the Monte is an ideal relaxed cruiser. Bumble along with a few mates, save the extra power for overtaking maneuvers, and you will not be disappointed. Until, that is, GM releases the rear-wheel-drive, 350hp Pontiac GTO … aka the Holden Monaro.



..Member's post your thoughts > Comments *Note; Opinions are like rear-ends > everybody has one, some just 'stink more then others `amen..."2 each their own opinions" You never have to agree or dis-agree (?) do U ?
 

Last edited by BeachBumMike; 05-02-2014 at 08:27 AM.
  #12  
Old 05-02-2014 | 08:04 AM
BeachBumMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,095
From: SpaceCoast, Florida
Cool 4>Sale Central Florida May 2014 >What do U think of it ?

contact ✉ ☎ contact

x prohibited[?]
Posted: 10 hours ago
1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo - $5500



condition: good
1987 chevrolet monte carlo automatic transmission title : clean

2nd owner, interior in excellent condition, garage kept, also have original SS mag wheels and tires.
 
  #13  
Old 05-02-2014 | 08:10 AM
BeachBumMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,095
From: SpaceCoast, Florida
Cool There's some great Monte's out there `if U search 4>Sure<

reply ✉ ☎ reply

x prohibited[?]
Posted: 23 days ago
1987 Pro Street Monte Carlo - $25000 (Cocoa) FL




condition: new
1987 Chev, Monte Carlo title : clean

Over $50,000.00 invested in this project, and it can be yours for only $25,000.00. The best of the best in building of this hot rod. Started off with a 502 crate motor, than bored out to 540 ci. Has 11to 1 compression. Alum. GM performance heads, ported and polished. Dart intake, Eagle crank, Mahley forged pistons, h-beam rods, Comp pro magnum rockers, 3/8 hardened pushrods, Pro system dominator carb, Hooker super comp headers and 3 inch exhaust with x-pipe. It also has a Griffin radiator and low profile electric fans, MSD ignition and a FTI turbo 400 with 8 in. converter. The tranny is by JW. This car was built by a professional engine builder with no expenses spared. The car has a near perfect body done in black. This is a great buy for the money, couldn't even begin to replace it for this price.
Call to see the car show contact info , ask for Ken. .
 
  #14  
Old 05-02-2014 | 09:01 AM
crazyzach722's Avatar
Monte of the Month -- March 2015
3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,627
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

I wouldn't mine having either of those 4th gens. Probably the first one cause that would be more of a reasonable car for me to get in like the next 5 years. Maybe eventually I will.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Space
General Monte Carlo Talk
2
09-17-2014 11:27 AM
Space
General Monte Carlo Talk
8
01-20-2013 06:23 PM
BeachBumMike
General Monte Carlo Talk
128
02-19-2009 09:26 AM
BeachBumMike
General Monte Carlo Talk
7
12-21-2006 06:43 AM
BeachBumMike
General Monte Carlo Talk
3
12-19-2006 04:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.