General Monte Carlo Talk Talk about the Monte Carlo. Does not have to be your Monte. Can include pics and games.

looky what i found

Old Mar 2, 2010 | 10:20 AM
  #11  
JAFO's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,196
From: Newberry, SC
Default

Originally Posted by monte carlo 3831
I don't want to sound stupid, but what are "etched windows for insurance purposes"?? it is a sweet monte by the way!!
Windows are etched with a serial number, possibly the VIN. That way someone can't steal the car and part it out,or at least the windows... not sure of what the market for MC windows is though Etching has been around for awhile but like I said I can't really see the benefit, most people that would steal cars could care less about the windows, it's the other parts they want. But if the insurance company likes it and will lower the premium, why the heck not?

Does look like a nice car, good luck captian!
 
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 10:50 AM
  #12  
RickAKATed10's Avatar
Photobucket
Monte Of The Month -- August 2009
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,827
From: Highland, IN
Default

It is definitely a nice car. Me being biased of course. I personally think they guy she have went a little further with cleaning it up though before taking pictures for an ebay listing.
 
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #13  
Taz's Avatar
Taz

Monte Of The Month -- March 2014
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 18,660
From: Windsor
15 Year Member
Default

The etched windows were supposed to be able to help identify a stolen vehicle. My 2004 came with it also. But it seems to me any thief can simply break the window and bye-bye etching.


The member I was thinking of is "red06ss". I checked the pictures I have of his Monte. It's not the same one.
 
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 06:01 PM
  #14  
captaindamnit's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 380
From: Iowa City, IOWA
Default

HA HA! if I can sell my car for 4-6 grand and if the price is right, I can get it!
 
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 07:32 PM
  #15  
CMC's Avatar
CMC
10 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
Default

Besides the stripes, I can't be more annoyed by that 327 badge on the car. The 5.3 is not a 327.
 
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 08:54 PM
  #16  
Jomao_o's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,152
From: MD.
15 Year Member
Default

Don't mean to be an idiot here, what's a 327?
 
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 09:00 PM
  #17  
monte carlo 3831's Avatar
Monte Of The Month - February 2010
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 11,981
From: Pittsburgh, PA
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by Jomao_o
Don't mean to be an idiot here, what's a 327?
Jose, that is when motors were measured in cubic inches and not liters
 
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 12:18 AM
  #18  
TheMonteMan's Avatar
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,910
From: nj
Default

correct its technically a 325 cubic inches but then again the ls1s not a 350 its like a 346 but ppl say they are. i dont think that liters convert to cubic inches to easily with out decimals and what not. gotta think about it like this a 5.0 mustang is a 302 and a 305 monte is a 5.0. 327 just sounds better then 325 even though its technically incorrect. and i hate when the stripes go over the roof too.
 
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 12:25 AM
  #19  
Don Klatt's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 13
Default

Sweet!!!
 
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 01:35 AM
  #20  
bumpin96monte's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,449
15 Year Member
Default

Besides the stripes, I can't be more annoyed by that 327 badge on the car. The 5.3 is not a 327.
Exactly the first thing that came to my mind too. However, I actually really like the whole look of the car other than the 327 badge.

but then again the ls1s not a 350 its like a 346 but ppl say they are.
That makes more sense to me because at least then you're just rounding off to 350. 325 is a more round number than 327.

i dont think that liters convert to cubic inches to easily with out decimals and what not.
Without doing the conversion, just directly calculating cubic inches:

LS4 bore = 3.780" stroke = 3.622"

Area of the bore = (pi * bore ^2)/4 = 11.22208 in^2 (using 3.1415927 for pi)

Cubic inches of one cylinder = area of bore * stroke = 40.64639 in^3

Cubic inches of engine = volume of one cylinder * number of cylinders = 325.1711

That converts to 5.3285 liters

(a straight 5.3L conversion is actually 323.4, even smaller than the 327, that would be closer to a 5.4 which is 329.5 cubic inches)

Also, just for conversation's sake- the real chevy 327's with a bore of 4.000" and a stroke of 3.250" is actually 326.726 cubic inches.

I personally think they guy she have went a little further with cleaning it up though before taking pictures for an ebay listing.
x2, or at least leave out the pic of the nasty floor mat. You'd figure the nicer the car looks, the more money you'd get for it.

its a fuel sippen v8
Don't know if I'd really call an LS4 'fuel sipping', its definitely not the kind of car you buy for getting great MPG.
 

Last edited by bumpin96monte; Mar 3, 2010 at 01:40 AM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.