06 3.9L VS SC3800
#41
10-07-2006, 03:54 AM
RE: 06 3.9L VS SC3800
well that sounds good that the the 3.9 waxed the 3.8 really well, the reason i ask this, is i came from a really fast car to a more of a gas saver and to be honest the 3.9 is weak to me i mean it runs great for a v6 but it still doesnt give me a great thrill besides knowing that it is a bad *** super nice car,
i was wondering what it would run in the quarter mile and what cars it would outrun so i could race some and get a good thrill but i havent raced anything in the 3.9 but a new 2006 5.3 z71 and a older chevy with a fresh hopped up 383 i left the z71 like it was standing still and i pulled on the 383 decently.
i was wondering what it would run in the quarter mile and what cars it would outrun so i could race some and get a good thrill but i havent raced anything in the 3.9 but a new 2006 5.3 z71 and a older chevy with a fresh hopped up 383 i left the z71 like it was standing still and i pulled on the 383 decently.
#42
10-07-2006, 07:38 PM
RE: 06 3.9L VS SC3800
ORIGINAL: 2006MonteCarlo
well that sounds good that the the 3.9 waxed the 3.8 really well, the reason i ask this, is i came from a really fast car to a more of a gas saver and to be honest the 3.9 is weak to me i mean it runs great for a v6 but it still doesnt give me a great thrill besides knowing that it is a bad *** super nice car,
i was wondering what it would run in the quarter mile and what cars it would outrun so i could race some and get a good thrill but i havent raced anything in the 3.9 but a new 2006 5.3 z71 and a older chevy with a fresh hopped up 383 i left the z71 like it was standing still and i pulled on the 383 decently.
well that sounds good that the the 3.9 waxed the 3.8 really well, the reason i ask this, is i came from a really fast car to a more of a gas saver and to be honest the 3.9 is weak to me i mean it runs great for a v6 but it still doesnt give me a great thrill besides knowing that it is a bad *** super nice car,
i was wondering what it would run in the quarter mile and what cars it would outrun so i could race some and get a good thrill but i havent raced anything in the 3.9 but a new 2006 5.3 z71 and a older chevy with a fresh hopped up 383 i left the z71 like it was standing still and i pulled on the 383 decently.
#43
10-07-2006, 11:41 PM
RE: 06 3.9L VS SC3800
yea you should pull on him if you have the 3.9 i traded in my 5.3 extendcab chevy half ton two wheel drive on this montecarlo. the truck ran good it was fast from a roll intill it hit second then it slowed down, intill it revved up again. from a dead stop the monte would kill my old truck, but from a roll the monte would walk it slowly intill second and third gear then it would pull.
#44
10-08-2006, 07:50 PM
RE: 06 3.9L VS SC3800
My 1990 Silv. 5.7 4x4 would show this monte who's boss, though. The only thing she lacked was top end. 0 - 60 was no contest for most cars back home. I took it to the track a few times, tried to race an f-150 lightning, but he wouldn't race me. Too scared from the sound of my fully dual straight pipes to thrush glasspacks (cats are not required down there). She was loud to say the least. Lots of add-on goodies. I miss her.
#45
10-10-2006, 02:12 PM
RE: 06 3.9L VS SC3800
every one has a old hot rod that they miss dearly, i guess it hard to get away from losing them, i know i miss mine
#46
10-10-2006, 02:33 PM
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,264
RE: 06 3.9L VS SC3800
i've got a supercharged 3.8l 2005 and i smoked a 5.3 silverado, and he was really trying, i dont see what the difference is because all these cars you guys are saying a monte wont keep up with or beat, i beat them, and to my knowledge there's nothing done to my car, i bought it with only 6000 miles on it with nothing done to it
#47
10-10-2006, 09:31 PM
RE: 06 3.9L VS SC3800
ORIGINAL: wiz kidd
i've got a supercharged 3.8l 2005 and i smoked a 5.3 silverado, and he was really trying,
i've got a supercharged 3.8l 2005 and i smoked a 5.3 silverado, and he was really trying,
#48
10-11-2006, 08:42 AM
RE: 06 3.9L VS SC3800
[IMG]local://upfiles/714/A5BF321AD804433F887A58939D7502FE.jpg[/IMG]
Racing a Silverado? Can you beat one that does
6.7-second 0-to-60-mph and 15.1-second, 90.5-mph?
2005 Chevrolet Silverado SS - Road Test & Review - Motor Trend
Six-Seat Street Striper: A jack-of-all-trades tries a few new tricks
[:-]Click below to read Review: Then line your `Monte up with one &
submit your report[:-]Oh, check out the link page on below site
for SS reports. Interesting read....4-$ure...EnJoy your Journey...`Space
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._ss/index.html
Racing a Silverado? Can you beat one that does
6.7-second 0-to-60-mph and 15.1-second, 90.5-mph?
2005 Chevrolet Silverado SS - Road Test & Review - Motor Trend
Six-Seat Street Striper: A jack-of-all-trades tries a few new tricks
[:-]Click below to read Review: Then line your `Monte up with one &
submit your report[:-]Oh, check out the link page on below site
for SS reports. Interesting read....4-$ure...EnJoy your Journey...`Space
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._ss/index.html
