Why are Gm LS motors so.....
a gm ls motor
Can someone explain to me why ... to get 200hp in a gm ls motor or any gm motor you need a 3.8L v6 engine...
And then you go to a honda 2007 and a stock motor comes 200hp at 2.0L 4 cyl also the mitshubishi ecplipse 2007 has a stock 269hp 3.8..
And then you go to a honda 2007 and a stock motor comes 200hp at 2.0L 4 cyl also the mitshubishi ecplipse 2007 has a stock 269hp 3.8..
You also need to realize that you're missing a lot of the picture by just look at HP numbers. HP RPM is important, as is the torque number, RPM, and curve shape. Next, you need to keep in mind one of the main goals was to design a long lasting, durable engine- and all of these added components could've easily jeopardized that- especially adding them back in the mid 90's when they were still untested. If you look at the cars the 3100's, 3400's, 3800's, etc came in- they were used as either the base engine of a sporty car- or as the high line engine in daily driver cars. You don't want your sports car's base engine to compete with the high line engines, and you don't want to put super high power engines in daily driver cars since that is not the driving factor in that segment (as oppposed to say a corvette).
Also, keep in mind- higher power and torque strains the transmission and driveline more, and having peak power at 8000+ RPM isn't great for engine longevity either- keeping engine rpm down means less movement and wear in all the moving components.
Explain to me please why gm motors run so low on horsepower.. its really pathetic in my opinion seeing that gm is kinda the " american vehicle"
I would just assume that they would come out with better stuff...
Oh and finally you need to go all the way up to 5.3L v8 to get 303 horseppower
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,607
From: Mentor, Ohio
Keep another thing in mind with weight comparison of these cars (and this is NOT a justification for all the heavier weight).... Cars today are being packaged with a lot more stuff then before! More air bags, more "computer" equipment for navigation/XM/iPod/Bluetooth OH and OnStar. Just to name a couple.
I'm sure there is more that I'm not thinking about, but these extra goodies weigh a little something and some of them we did not have 15 years ago.
I'm sure there is more that I'm not thinking about, but these extra goodies weigh a little something and some of them we did not have 15 years ago.
Me too, torque is what gets you that pin you to your seat acceleration
I've driven some high horsepower, lower torque European cars and its not nearly as fun as driving a high torque American car
The 3800 is the best engine I've ever had and IMO the best gm has ever made. This is my 3rd car with it. I still don't see why they discontinued it. We have a few customers with 300,000+ miles on 3.8 Liters and they still run just as smooth and quiet as brand new. My S/C 3.8L, even with all the mods, still gets 28-30 mpg highway.
Wayne
remember this torqu gets you there hp keeps you there in performance aspect. if you didnt have decent torqu the car wouldent get out og its way. but it would be like a deisle high torqu low horse power. but most v6 i4 have moderet torqu and hp now compared to 15 20 years ago. so now if you can look at the hp and torqu rating from then and now engins. but i do agre with bumpin where you have a daily reliable car why tear in to it fitting in a big engine if it is a only dd.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brian Kolecke
Monte Carlo Repair Help
0
Jun 24, 2013 08:53 PM





















