Racing your Monte Raced a guy in your ride? Had that Monte Carlo of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.

V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-14-2007, 12:54 PM
tlip06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 95
Default V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

has any one raced these chargers, because i have raced a few and won
 
  #2  
Old 10-14-2007, 05:20 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Latrobe, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,283
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

I've seen videos of them at the track, with a STOCK SS, NON S/C, and they win....

its he srt8's that are the scary ones to be near...

luckily, most people dont wanna pay 48000 for the charger srt8
 
  #3  
Old 10-14-2007, 07:21 PM
Taz's Avatar
Taz
Taz is offline

Monte Of The Month -- March 2014
15 Year Member
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Windsor
Posts: 18,646
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

Here's the info on a 2006 Dodge Charger base model with the V6 engine.
Info is from cars.com

I think the fact that the Charger is a little over 400 pounds heavier, may have had something to do with it.

[hr]


Engine
250-hp, 3.5-liter V-6


Specifications

Engine liters: 3.5
Cylinder configuration:
V-6
Horsepower: 250-hp @ 6,400 rpm
Torque:
250 lbs.-ft. @ 3,800 rpm
# of valves: 24
Variable intake manifold

Sequential MPI
Recommended fuel:
regular unleaded
Aluminum cylinder block
Aluminum cylinder head

Ignition type: electronic
Engine orientation:
longitudinal
Fuel economy city: 19 mpg
Fuel economy highway:
27 mpg
Fuel tank capacity: 18.0 gal.


Estimated Performance Specs

0-60 mph: 7.50 seconds
1/4 mile: 15.62 seconds at 89.71 mph
Lateral acceleration: .80 g
Slalom: 58 mph


Standard Specs and Dimensions

Engine type: V-6
Engine displacement: 215 cu.in.
Engine horsepower: 250-hp @ 6,400 rpm
Engine torque: 250 lbs.-ft. @ 3,800 rpm
Valvetrain: SOHC
Valves: 24
Engine bore x stroke: 3.8" x 3.2"
Compression ratio: 9.90 to 1
Fuel tank capacity: 18.0 gal.
Fuel economy city: 19 mpg
Fuel economy highway: 27 mpg
Drag coefficient: .33
Curb weight: 3,800 lbs.
Exterior length: 200.1"
Exterior body width: 74.5"
Exterior height: 58.2"
Wheelbase: 120.0"
Turning radius: 19.4'
Ground clearance (min.): 5.2"
 
  #4  
Old 10-14-2007, 07:50 PM
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, WI
Posts: 3,986
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

$48,000 Damn. Can't wait to see the price on the Challenger

Guess I'm going to wait about 7 years to get a used Challenger....then add Twin Turbo
 
  #5  
Old 10-14-2007, 08:06 PM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,173
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

yah that sounds killer, im more than happy with what i have now
 
  #6  
Old 10-15-2007, 11:51 AM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Latrobe, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,283
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

Yah, that is a fully loaded SRT8 though, and I think that with my military discount, I was looking at 42,000 before taxes..

That was actually the first car I had lined up, but it fell through, and thats why I bought my monte from a dodge dealer, they had it layin around, and it caught my eye

it was love at first sight =)

Anyways, yah, the weight has alot to do with it, but the v6 just doesnt produce enough..

Now, the R/T V8 5.4L is the kicker... but I've still seen it get taken by a monte..

-Keegan
 
  #7  
Old 10-15-2007, 01:57 PM
Cowboy6622's Avatar

Fallen to the Dark Side - Resident Ford Man
5 Year Member
3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,901
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

wouldn't mind have a charger r/t myself... bang for the buck, the r/t would be the best way, that SR/T 8 is just too much money, plus i've seen those R/T's run with the new mustangs... i would probably die if i had the extra 80hp? or so the SR/T 8's have.
 
  #8  
Old 10-15-2007, 02:35 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Latrobe, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,283
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

The srt8 is an amazing piece of equipment...

yah, 425 hp and torque...

 
  #9  
Old 10-15-2007, 04:36 PM
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,147
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

There is going to be a new srt8 enginein the 2009 Challenger that is close to 460HP
that is what a dealer told my dad though so not for sure
 
  #10  
Old 10-15-2007, 04:49 PM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,173
Default RE: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte

460 horse? goodness sounds like im gonna need a bigger engine
 


Quick Reply: V6 Charger vs. 3.8L SC SS, or 3.9L Monte



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 AM.