top ten cars that dont deserve their engines
#13
RE: top ten cars that dont deserve their engines
i guess it was made my Ford.... but it was a Mercury if you REALLY want to get tecnical..... i love the 70 Eliminator with a 428 CJ though....
I knew you had it RJ when you posted a friend having a 390/4 speed one... great cars if you ask me.... so I posted to make sure everyone knew the difference
I knew you had it RJ when you posted a friend having a 390/4 speed one... great cars if you ask me.... so I posted to make sure everyone knew the difference
#14
RE: top ten cars that dont deserve their engines
ORIGINAL: Cowboy6622
make sure you know the difference in a Cyclone and a Syclone
make sure you know the difference in a Cyclone and a Syclone
Thanks Duane, now I'll stealthily go back and fix all that...
#16
RE: top ten cars that dont deserve their engines
Did I miss something? I didn't know Furd continued to make the Cyclone utilizing the Cougar and Turino bodies.
The Cyclone a long ago friend owned was more of the square-ish Comet body style.
I know it was rumored to be one movin ride.
The Cyclone a long ago friend owned was more of the square-ish Comet body style.
I know it was rumored to be one movin ride.
#19
RE: top ten cars that dont deserve their engines
i think it counted down from 10 to 1 and i never heard of the gmc4.3 turbo that would be so sweet i had a 4.3 in a blazer that was about pos as u can get and i raced a bunch of 4 banger cars and beat them a turbo one would be so sweet