Are Station Wagons Cool?
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 707
To be honest. To me, a Cadillac should be the ultimate in class and refinement inside and out. And the CTS-V doesn't do that IMO. But that's just my taste. I think GM should leave the ultra crazy performance for the other divisions.
Rolls Royce doesn't make a sports car. You know why? Because they know what their market is, and what their reputation is for. They're known for royalty-level class and refinement. And airplane/military engines.
Just my opinion. But GM needs to quit trying to make a Cadillac version of everything. No Cadillac trucks, SUV's, cross overs, muscle cars, minivans, bicycles, pizza delivery wagons, grocery carts, etc, etc, etc, what ever. Just stick to what Cadillac is known for. The ultimate in a domestic luxury car.
Rolls Royce doesn't make a sports car. You know why? Because they know what their market is, and what their reputation is for. They're known for royalty-level class and refinement. And airplane/military engines.
Just my opinion. But GM needs to quit trying to make a Cadillac version of everything. No Cadillac trucks, SUV's, cross overs, muscle cars, minivans, bicycles, pizza delivery wagons, grocery carts, etc, etc, etc, what ever. Just stick to what Cadillac is known for. The ultimate in a domestic luxury car.
I wouldn't criticize Chevrolet for a chinsy interior as much as I would Cadillac because Cadillac is on a higher scale as far as luxury goes. Ifeel like the Monte Carlo has one of the greatest interiors Chevrolet or GM ever put into a car. GM is known for chinsy interiors, but still.. .dang. The Cadillac honestly has about the same interior as a Chevy Impala from the same time period to me. That, I find unacceptable.
The ford woody is awesome, so are the chevy nomads. The new cadilliac is either you like it or your dont. I do agree cadillac needs to pick a market, and what i find amusing is that the $110k+ corvette ZR1 has the same cheap plastic interior as any other car, its got the same steering wheel as my moms HHR except it has a corvette badge slapped on.
To be honest. To me, a Cadillac should be the ultimate in class and refinement inside and out. And the CTS-V doesn't do that IMO. But that's just my taste. I think GM should leave the ultra crazy performance for the other divisions.
Rolls Royce doesn't make a sports car. You know why? Because they know what their market is, and what their reputation is for. They're known for royalty-level class and refinement. And airplane/military engines.
Just my opinion. But GM needs to quit trying to make a Cadillac version of everything. No Cadillac trucks, SUV's, cross overs, muscle cars, minivans, bicycles, pizza delivery wagons, grocery carts, etc, etc, etc, what ever. Just stick to what Cadillac is known for. The ultimate in a domestic luxury car.
Rolls Royce doesn't make a sports car. You know why? Because they know what their market is, and what their reputation is for. They're known for royalty-level class and refinement. And airplane/military engines.
Just my opinion. But GM needs to quit trying to make a Cadillac version of everything. No Cadillac trucks, SUV's, cross overs, muscle cars, minivans, bicycles, pizza delivery wagons, grocery carts, etc, etc, etc, what ever. Just stick to what Cadillac is known for. The ultimate in a domestic luxury car.
if i had money to buy a cadillac, id be shopping for a 1957 eldorado show car
Thread Starter
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,226
From: Lakeland, Florida
I have seen some nice Caddy wagons that were built in the 70's on the DeVille chassis. They are not common as most Caddy wagons were hearses but not all.
