Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

Post up your gun collection!

Old Dec 27, 2012 | 04:31 PM
  #121  
ZIPPY02's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- May 2012
Monte Of The Year 2012
Monte Of The Month -- February 2017
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,938
From: Mountains of Utah
15 Year Member
Default

Perhaps you need to sell (wink wink) some of your guns so you won't have so many to register. I would be more discreet when it comes to revealing what blasters your sitting on. Times are a changing people and not for the betterment of weapon owners either. See article below:

American Gun Owners to be Fingerprinted and Registered: Feinstein Announces Nightmare Plan

Infowars.com
December 27, 2012

California Democrat Dianne Feinstein will introduce legislation in January calling for the fingerprinting and registering of all gun owners in the United States.

On her Senate web page, Feinstein states her proposed legislation will add fingerprinting and photo identification to the National Firearms Act.

A firearms seller must currently submit Form 4473 to the government containing the name, address, driver license information, NICS background check transaction number, serial number and model of the firearm, and a short federal affidavit stating that the purchaser is eligible to purchase firearms under federal law. Feinstein’s bill will add a substantial layer of bureaucracy to the existing regulations.

The effort to expand firearms registration will include weapons grandfathered prior to the enactment of Feinstein’s proposed legislation. In other words, all gun owners will be required to register their constitutionally guaranteed firearms with a federal government inimical to the Second Amendment.

Feinstein’s registration process will likely surpass New York City’s handgun permit process, which is a bureaucratic nightmare. In addition to non-refundable fees totaling over $500, the permit process demands two recent color photos, a birth certificate, proof of citizenship and residence, a blizzard of affidavits, and other red-tape hurdles. Applications are routinely denied for spurious reasons, including non-violent misdemeanors and depression.

As Dean Weingarten notes, gun registration is de facto gun confiscation. Following mandatory gun registration, the government “will know who has legal possession of each firearm. They will know where the firearm is stored. When physical possession of the gun is desired, they can order you to turn it in. This has happened repeatedly,” most notably in **** Germany, Red China and Soviet Russia.

More recently, it has occurred in Kosovo, Great Britain, Australia, New York, and California. If Feinstein has her way next month, it will happen across America.

Democrats and their Republican co-conspirators are going all out to ban firearms. Feinstein’s bill will ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of 120 specifically-named firearms, including semiautomatic rifles, handguns, and shotguns that can accept detachable and fixed magazines and have “one military characteristic.”

In addition, Feinstein’s bill will outlaw flash suppressors, bayonet mounts, thumbhole stocks and bullet buttons on firearms.

Make no mistake about it. Obama and his anti-Second Amendment allies in Congress are coming for your guns. If they have their way, the only legal firearms in America will be rifles with 10 round magazines and single shot and bolt-action rifles – and those firearms will be registered with the government and may be confiscated at any moment.


Name:  swat_default.jpg
Views: 32
Size:  21.7 KB
 
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 02:16 AM
  #122  
ZIPPY02's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- May 2012
Monte Of The Year 2012
Monte Of The Month -- February 2017
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,938
From: Mountains of Utah
15 Year Member
Default

As I read it, this would mean that any “assault weapon” would have to be registered as a class III NFA weapon with a $200 tax stamp, with perhaps the same applying to any magazine of 11 rounds or more. Talk about overreach. Maybe this is their response to the deficit? Ten million or firearms alone registered at $200 each pays for more universal health care. Never-mind if they require registering all those magazines. Question: Under her proposed law, when I die, am I unable to leave my listed weapon(s) to my kids? Would that fall under the ban on transfer of the weapon after the exempted owner is deceased? Seems to me that according to this proposal once you die, your firearms will be turned in for destruction. In one generation they will have a near complete gun ban. The registration would just be a bonus for them to make it easier for them to prevent guns from slipping through the cracks. They will give up some items in this proposal but they will not give up the transfer ban. That’s the key part of the anti’s long term strategy. The potential financial/employment impact of what would essentially be disarmament within a generation or so is huge.

"Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
120 specifically-named firearms;
Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one or more military characteristics; and
Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds. Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
Background check of owner and any transferee;
Type and serial number of the firearm;
Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration."

They are coming for your guns people.....
 

Last edited by ZIPPY02; Dec 28, 2012 at 02:20 AM.
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 10:47 AM
  #123  
milrlyt's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 871
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

First of all, action of that severity would most certainly cause a riot. Secondly, they still have their cushy jobs to worry about. As seen with Mitt, what you say years ago will come back to bite you in the butt. They won't be confiscating anyone's guns.
 
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 12:15 PM
  #124  
Budsjlm's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- September 2012
Monte Of The Month -- February 2016
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,758
From: Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota
15 Year Member
Default

Nothing yet but have been looking and will be purchasing soon
then getting carry permit,

may have to get this just for the cool factor, desert eagle Micro

my budy has one and i like it alot
 
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 12:45 PM
  #125  
turbo monte's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- July 2012
Monte Of The Month -- August 2016
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,056
From: ford city, pa
15 Year Member
Default

get your carry permit first so when you get it your good to go

as far as the ban goes etc. zippy, the goverment already knows what i have, there registered to me when i buy them so there is nothing to hide. and i agree let them try to take us Americans guns away. i see a huge riot and a war amongst the gun lovers vs the anti gun/law enforcement jerk offs if they try.
 
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #126  
ZIPPY02's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- May 2012
Monte Of The Year 2012
Monte Of The Month -- February 2017
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,938
From: Mountains of Utah
15 Year Member
Default

[QUOTE=turbo monte;516633]get your carry permit first so when you get it your good to go

as far as the ban goes etc. zippy, the goverment already knows what i have, there registered to me when i buy them so there is nothing to hide. and i agree let them try to take us Americans guns away. i see a huge riot and a war amongst the gun lovers vs the anti gun/law enforcement jerk offs if they try.

I hear you John, and that is one of the provisions, even if you own the gun now you will still have to go back and get reapproved and pay possibly a $200 fee to register like a Class 3 weapon it if it falls into their Assault rifle, pistol list. And they will want us to turn in ANY weapon we own that does not fit into their sporting gun criteria if we don't pay their fee. I too see them having a difficult time passing this. Yet with a few more wack job incidents , they may find it easier to get their laws passed with all the "Drones" who don't own guns supporting them. None of my blasters are even registered as I never had to when buying them years back. I would rather not have them know anything about what I'm sitting on.
 

Last edited by ZIPPY02; Dec 28, 2012 at 01:04 PM.
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 01:04 PM
  #127  
Budsjlm's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- September 2012
Monte Of The Month -- February 2016
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,758
From: Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by turbo monte
get your carry permit first so when you get it your good to go

as far as the ban goes etc. zippy, the goverment already knows what i have, there registered to me when i buy them so there is nothing to hide. and i agree let them try to take us Americans guns away. i see a huge riot and a war amongst the gun lovers vs the anti gun/law enforcement jerk offs if they try.
I need to get some range time in before i do much of anything, i either need to play with shooting with my left or do exstensive right eye training as i am a righty but left eye dominant, =(
 
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 01:12 PM
  #128  
turbo monte's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- July 2012
Monte Of The Month -- August 2016
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,056
From: ford city, pa
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by Budsjlm
I need to get some range time in before i do much of anything, i either need to play with shooting with my left or do exstensive right eye training as i am a righty but left eye dominant, =(
ouch yea thats not fun to train for. can you shoot with both eyes open by chance? if you can that will solve the problem.
 
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 01:29 PM
  #129  
Budsjlm's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- September 2012
Monte Of The Month -- February 2016
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,758
From: Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by turbo monte
ouch yea thats not fun to train for. can you shoot with both eyes open by chance? if you can that will solve the problem.
Can and have in the past, but mainly just target and deer hunting, it's a b word to focus
Realisticly i'll probably work on left hand shooting and see how bad it is, god forbid when i do get a carry and somthing happends i don't want to have to fight to focus
 
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #130  
turbo monte's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- July 2012
Monte Of The Month -- August 2016
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,056
From: ford city, pa
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by Budsjlm
Can and have in the past, but mainly just target and deer hunting, it's a b word to focus
Realisticly i'll probably work on left hand shooting and see how bad it is, god forbid when i do get a carry and somthing happends i don't want to have to fight to focus
very true! if needed you wanna pull and know the gun well enough to pretty much have it aimed where it needs to be and then fine tune with the sights quickly. i spent hours and boxs of shells doing this. i would keep my gun holstered untill i was ready and then i would quick draw fire 3 shells and re holster as quick as possible. it helps so much but takes a lot of practice!
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.