Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

(?)How GM, Ford Flipped Positions In Less Than 5 Months(?)<

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-15-2014, 10:06 AM
BeachBumMike's Avatar
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SpaceCoast, Florida
Posts: 16,095
Question (?)How GM, Ford Flipped Positions In Less Than 5 Months(?)<

Bill Koenig, Contributor
I write about the auto industry and its impact on almost everything.
May 15,/2014 @ 6:13AM |19,650 views

How GM, Ford Flipped Positions In Less Than 5 Months

For MCF Member's to "Stay in the know of what's happening ?"

Good Restroom Reading >


Here’s why the auto industry never gets boring.
At the end of 2013, General Motors GM -1.4% and Ford Motor F -0.63% seemed to be at opposite ends of the spectrum. Detroit-based GM was basking in the glow of a historic transition. Mary Barrahad been named the first woman to head a U.S.-based automaker. The company was applauded.

Dearborn, Mich.-based Ford had questions whether its executive handover would go smoothly as Alan Mulally seemed to be going through his version of “The Long Goodbye.” An heir apparent, Chief Operating Officer Mark Fields, was in place. But there were questions just when and how Mulally would leave. Mulally was reported to be courted by Microsoft MSFT -1.52% as a possible CEO and the Ford boss never quite put that to rest.

Move up Information for the World's Business Leaders - Forbes.com tMove down

Ford's Mulally Stays Put; Will Automaker's CEO Handoff Now Go Smoothly? Bill Koenig Contributor
Now, GM has the uncertainty because of a continuing recall controversy while Ford’s executive lineup has been resolved. One got caught up in a crisis years in the making. One defied decades of its own history. Things change.

Barra, figuratively, didn’t have enough time to get the GM CEO seat warm when the automaker recalled ignition switches associated with accidents, injuries and deaths. Worse, the bad news came out in dribs and drabs. The problem had surfaced years earlier but GM didn’t do a formal recall until this year. The number of deaths was first put at six, then it went up to 13. The amount of first-quarter expenses for the recalls expanded.

The CEO testified before Congress and faced many press questions when she was made available to reporters. A bad sign: Saturday Night Live did a parody of her congressional testimony. Management Rule No. 1: Having comics pretend to be be you on Saturday Night Live is almost never a good thing.

On May 14, The Wall Street Journal reported GM’s board hired a law firm to review the flow of information to directors concerning product defects. The Journal also reported that the board meeting “at least weekly” with Barra to “monitor her overhaul of the company’s operations.” GM declined to comment to the Journal about its story.

Today, GM announced five more recalls covering 2.7 million vehicles in the United States for taillamp malfunctions and other problems. The automaker said it expects to record costs of as much as $200 million for the second quarter.
The GM recall story is a long way from being resolved. In turn, that ensures GM’s uncertainty will continue — a much different story line for the company compared with the end of last year.
At Ford, executive transition was supposed to be ongoing story throughout 2014. But it didn’t work out that way.

First, Mulally finally, definitively said he wasn’t going to Microsoft in a January interview with The Associated Press.
On May 1, Ford announced Mulally’s retirement with a firm end date, July 1. Thus, the CEO is leaving before the end of 2014 (which was the previous plan). He won’t remain on the board as new boss Fields takes the helm. At other companies, CEOs have run into turbulence when their predecessors stayed on as directors.

Whatever happened behind the scenes, Ford did something very un-Ford like. Executive intrigue at Ford has filled books and countless news stories over the decades: Henry Ford II firing Lee Iacocca because he didn’t like him (1970s version); Donald Petersen alienating the Ford family, leading to him being forced out early (1980s and 1990s version); outgoing Alex Trotman calling Bill Ford Jr. “Prince William,” which wasn’t intended as a compliment (1990s); and Bill Ford deposing Jacques Nasser as CEO before hiring Mulally from Boeing to rescue the company (2000s).

In the end, whatever it took, Ford pulled off a smooth transfer.

When a company goes against its historic grain in a positive way, goodwill usually increases.
But this isn’t the final word for either company. Automakers deal with issues that are often years in the making, which GM knows all too well with its faulty ignition switches. GM and Ford could well switch positions yet again. Who knows what the story lines will be five months from now? I hope that there's news about a new Chevy Monte Carlo (?)
 

Last edited by BeachBumMike; 05-15-2014 at 10:08 AM.
  #2  
Old 05-15-2014, 10:25 AM
BeachBumMike's Avatar
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SpaceCoast, Florida
Posts: 16,095
Question WHich one do U like best ? Please POST ?


Would you rather have a New Ford Mustang, or a New Chevy Camaro ?
Let your Monte Carlo Family Know ?
============================

I like them both (?)
I need to test drive them both & then I will be able
to judge them better..
Competition is Good for Everyone
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Space
Off Topic
15
10-03-2011 04:30 PM
Stevis
Meets & Gatherings
2
07-03-2010 09:45 AM
JuniorCar
NASCAR Racing
13
04-09-2009 10:24 PM



Quick Reply: (?)How GM, Ford Flipped Positions In Less Than 5 Months(?)<



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.