Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.
View Poll Results: Which one would you pick ?
2012 Volkswagen GTI
0
0%
2012 Mini John Cooper Works
0
0%
2011 Nissan 370"Z"
2
22.22%
2011 Ford Mustang "GT"
4
44.44%
2012 Mazda MX5
1
11.11%
2011 Misubishi Lancer Evolution MR
2
22.22%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Best-Handling Car For Less Than $40K

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 05:04 AM
  #1  
Space's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,585
From: Beach`in Florida
Question Best-Handling Car For Less Than $40K

Best-Handling Car For Less Than $40,000 - Feature

We match up six affordable ($ Not affordable to me : ) athletes to find the cornering champ.

Member's, If you had $40K in your Auto Saving Funds & had to choose one of the below cars ? Which one would you PICK ? ? ?
Post & let us know ? It's a great article & I learned more about handling.
EnJoy the article, & it's going to be interesting to see what our Member's choose from the limited below list of vehicles....EnJoy (It has some decent vid's on their tests : )

BY K.C. COLWELL, PHOTOGRAPHY BY MARC URBANO, ILLUSTRATION BY BRYAN CHRISTIE DESIGN from Car & Driver October issue
September 2011

Pages: 1 2345678Photos





<TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=188><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><SCRIPT type=text/javascript>function MM_preloadImages() { //v3.0var d=document; if(d.images){ if(!d.MM_p) d.MM_p=new Array();var i,j=d.MM_p.length,a=MM_preloadImages.arguments; for(i=0; i<a.length; i++)if (a[i].indexOf("#")!=0){ d.MM_p[j]=new Image; d.MM_p[j++].src=a;}}}function MM_swapImgRestore() { //v3.0var i,x,a=document.MM_sr; for(i=0;a&&i<a.length&&(x=a)&&x.oSrc;i++) x.src=x.oSrc;}function MM_findObj(n, d) { //v4.01var p,i,x; if(!d) d=document; if((p=n.indexOf("?"))>0&&parent.frames.length) {d=parent.frames[n.substring(p+1)].document; n=n.substring(0,p);}if(!(x=d[n])&&d.all) x=d.all[n]; for (i=0;!x&&i<d.forms.length;i++) x=d.forms[n];for(i=0;!x&&d.layers&&i<d.layers.length;i++) x=MM_findObj(n,d.layers.document);if(!x && d.getElementById) x=d.getElementById(n); return x;}function MM_swapImage() { //v3.0var i,j=0,x,a=MM_swapImage.arguments; document.MM_sr=new Array; for(i=0;i<(a.length-2);i+=3)if ((x=MM_findObj(a))!=null){document.MM_sr[j++]=x; if(!x.oSrc) x.oSrc=x.src; x.src=a[i+2];}}</SCRIPT><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=577><TBODY><TR><TD style="PADDING-LEFT: 6px; PADDING-RIGHT: 14px; VERTICAL-ALIGN: top; PADDING-TOP: 0px" vAlign=top width=345> Handling, in the simplest terms, can be defined as how a car responds to driver inputs and how it communicates feedback. Are the responses and feedback smooth? Do they inspire confidence? Does the car have insanely high limits? Does it approach those limits gradually? Feel connected? We take all this into consideration with every car we test. But rarely do we isolate each individual handling trait, tear it apart, and put it back together to the degree we’re about to here.

Last October, we selected seven cars to compete for the title of best-handling car for less than $100,000. This year, we decided to lower that price cap to put it within reach of more car enthusiasts, with a minimum of financial finagling or illegal activity required. All the cars here can be purchased, with all their performance-enhancing options (big brakes, sport packages, and summer tires, for example), for less than $40,000.

Our editors entered into a handling conclave, emerging with six finalists: Ford Mustang GT, Mazda MX-5 Miata, Mini John Cooper Works, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR, Nissan 370Z, and Volkswagen GTI—all cars that have impressed us with their dynamic competence.

At this point, you might be asking, Where’s the BMW? The omission of a Bavarian representative was not intentional. The next-generation 2012 3-series sedan goes on sale in February, and so it seemed silly to include a 2011 model that would be all but done by the time this issue’s ink dried. A suitable 328i coupe (which continues through the 2012 model year on the existing platform) or 128i were unavailable. A 135i with the M Sport package breaks the $40K cap.

The sweet-of-chassis Mazda RX-8 was also a non-starter. Sadly, 2011 is the final year for the rotary until further notice.

Four of the cars’ base prices are more than $30,000; two are less. There are two front-drivers, three rear-drivers, and one four-wheel-drive machine. It’s a motley crew of  body styles, and half of them (Miata, Mustang, and GTI) are reigning 10Best champs. Only the Nissan and the Mazda are sports cars from the ground up. The remaining four have more plebeian roots.

We once again called upon vehicle-behavior consultants Cayman Dynamics to assist us in the acquisition of empirical data. The company’s ability to systematically dissect a chassis and its subsystems goes far beyond our attention span, so we limited it to four critical tests [see here].

The sub-40 six were subjected to serious scrutiny. We spent two days bombing southeast Ohio’s roller coaster of Appalachian tarmac, followed by a full day of instrumented proving-grounds testing to find ­lateral acceleration, braking distances, and slalom velocity. We then capped off the inquiry with an extra-full day of lapping the 2.2-mile gem called Grattan Raceway Park to get full, unabridged impressions of each car’s limits and behaviors. Lap times were recorded and broken down into sectors for analysis but played no role in the finishing order.




</TD><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top; PADDING-TOP: 0px" vAlign=top width=221><MAP id=m_besthandlingunder40 name=m_besthandlingunder40><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_volkswagen_gti_page_2" shape=poly alt="" coords=5,43,217,43,217,179,5,179,5,155><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_mini_john_cooper_works_page_3" shape=poly alt="" coords=5,195,217,195,217,331,5,331,5,307><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_nissan_370z_page_4" shape=poly alt="" coords=5,356,217,356,217,492,5,492,5,468></I></I></I></I></I>
<AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_ford_mustang_gt_page_5" shape=poly alt="" coords=5,508,217,508,217,644,5,644,5,620><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_mazda_mx-5_miata_page_6" shape=poly alt="" coords=5,664,217,664,217,800,5,800,5,776><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_mitsubishi_lancer_evolution_mr_page_7" shape=poly alt="" coords=5,815,217,815,217,951,5,951,5,927><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/content/download/285252/4622853/version/1/file/Best-Handling-Specs-and-Performance2.pdf" shape=poly alt="" coords=4,963,216,963,216,1013,4,1013,4,989></MAP>




</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><STYLE>#besthandlingcategories { background: url(http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...-eng-US/bg.jpg) no-repeat;}#besthandlingcategoriestext { width: 550px; padding: 13px;}</STYLE>The final ranking would be decided by how our panel of judges voted in 10 distinct handling categories. To wit:</I></I></I></I>

We broke overall steering feel into three parts. STEERING RESPONSE deals with how a car reacts to wheel inputs. Is the response smooth or choppy? Does the vehicle require constant correction? Is there a big delay between input and direction change?</I>

How well the steering communicates tire distress and road imperfections falls under STEERING FEEDBACK.

ON-CENTER FEEL is as it sounds—you want a little resistance in the steering wheel off the 12 o’clock position but not too much.

Perfect CHASSIS BALANCE, a 10 on our scale, would mean that the car behaves neutrally at the tires’ adhesion limit, neither pushing with its front wheels (understeer) nor swinging wide with its rears (oversteer). Excessive understeer or oversteer would lower this score.

What we call TRANSIENT BEHAVIOR refers to how a car transitions between two vectors. Think of all the things a skier has to do to change direction—are his body movements economical and crisp? That’s what we’re looking for here.

On a related note, excessive roll or pitch would bring down a BODY-CONTROL score.

BREAKAWAY BEHAVIOR deals with how a car reacts to finding and exceeding its limits. Snap or lift-throttle oversteer would shave a point or two from this score.

BRAKE FEEL AND RESPONSE are combined into one category. A brake pedal should be firm and easy to modulate without a dead spot in the first few inches of travel.

ERGONOMICS refers to the man-machine interface. In this test, we limit ergonomics to handling-related aspects. For example: The driver’s seat, pedal placement, and driving position—not the switchgear—determine a car’s score.

FUN TO DRIVE is, well, pretty much self-explanatory.

[i][i][i][i][i]All six cars, just by virtue of  being on this list, are starting with pretty high base-level credentials. But only one will claim the title of  best-handling car for less than $40,000.

<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>function MM_preloadImages() { //v3.0var d=document; if(d.images){ if(!d.MM_p) d.MM_p=new Array();var i,j=d.MM_p.length,a=MM_preloadImages.arguments; for(i=0; i<a.length; i++)if (a[i].indexOf("#")!=0){ d.MM_p[j]=new Image; d.MM_p[j++].src=a[i];}}}function MM_swapImgRestore() { //v3.0var i,x,a=document.MM_sr; for(i=0;a&&i<a.length&&(x=a[i])&&x.oSrc;i++) x.src=x.oSrc;}function MM_findObj(n, d) { //v4.01var p,i,x; if(!d) d=document; if((p=n.indexOf("?"))>0&&parent.frames.length) {d=parent.frames[n.substring(p+1)].document; n=n.substring(0,p);}if(!(x=d[n])&&d.all) x=d.all[n]; for (i=0;!x&&i<d.forms.length;i++) x=d.forms[i][n];for(i=0;!x&&d.layers&&i<d.layers.length;i++) x=MM_findObj(n,d.layers[i].document);if(!x && d.getElementById) x=d.getElementById(n); return x;}function MM_swapImage() { //v3.0var i,j=0,x,a=MM_swapImage.arguments; document.MM_sr=new Array; for(i=0;i<(a.length-2);i+=3)if ((x=MM_findObj(a[i]))!=null){document.MM_sr[j++]=x; if(!x.oSrc) x.oSrc=x.src; x.src=a[i+2];}}</SCRIPT>
<MAP id=m_besthandlingunder40INTROnav name=m_besthandlingunder40INTROnav><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_volkswagen_gti_page_2" shape=poly alt="" coords=3,5,82,5,82,19,3,19,3,15><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_mini_john_cooper_works_page_3" shape=poly alt="" coords=98,4,221,4,221,18,98,18,98,14><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_nissan_370z_page_4" shape=poly alt="" coords=233,5,298,5,298,19,233,19,233,15><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_ford_mustang_gt_page_5" shape=poly alt="" coords=310,3,397,3,397,17,310,17,310,13><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_mazda_mx-5_miata_page_6" shape=poly alt="" coords=413,4,506,4,506,18,413,18,413,14><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_mitsubishi_lancer_evolution_mr_page_7" shape=poly alt="" coords=517,4,573,4,573,18,517,18,517,10><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_mitsubishi_lancer_evolution_mr_page_7" shape=poly alt="" coords=4,22,105,22,105,36,4,36,4,32><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/how_we_measure_handling_page_8" shape=poly alt="" coords=119,22,256,22,256,36,119,36,119,32><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/content/download/285252/4622853/version/1/file/Best-Handling-Specs-and-Performance2.pdf" shape=poly alt="" coords=270,22,531,22,531,36,270,36,270,32></MAP><TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=361><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Continued...


^^Click above Continued


Pages: 1 2345678Photos

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature
^^Source link ^^
 

Last edited by Space; Oct 3, 2011 at 06:16 AM.
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 06:14 AM
  #2  
Space's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,585
From: Beach`in Florida
Default

How We Measure Handling - Feature


<TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=134><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=178><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>Measuring-handling-title - You do not have permission to view this object.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><SCRIPT type=text/javascript>function MM_preloadImages() { //v3.0var d=document; if(d.images){ if(!d.MM_p) d.MM_p=new Array();var i,j=d.MM_p.length,a=MM_preloadImages.arguments; for(i=0; i<a.length; i++)if (a[i].indexOf("#")!=0){ d.MM_p[j]=new Image; d.MM_p[j++].src=a[i];}}}function MM_swapImgRestore() { //v3.0var i,x,a=document.MM_sr; for(i=0;a&&i<a.length&&(x=a[i])&&x.oSrc;i++) x.src=x.oSrc;}function MM_findObj(n, d) { //v4.01var p,i,x; if(!d) d=document; if((p=n.indexOf("?"))>0&&parent.frames.length) {d=parent.frames[n.substring(p+1)].document; n=n.substring(0,p);}if(!(x=d[n])&&d.all) x=d.all[n]; for (i=0;!x&&i<d.forms.length;i++) x=d.forms[i][n];for(i=0;!x&&d.layers&&i<d.layers.length;i++) x=MM_findObj(n,d.layers[i].document);if(!x && d.getElementById) x=d.getElementById(n); return x;}function MM_swapImage() { //v3.0var i,j=0,x,a=MM_swapImage.arguments; document.MM_sr=new Array; for(i=0;i<(a.length-2);i+=3)if ((x=MM_findObj(a[i]))!=null){document.MM_sr[j++]=x; if(!x.oSrc) x.oSrc=x.src; x.src=a[i+2];}}</SCRIPT><MAP id=m_besthandlingunder40MEASUREnav name=m_besthandlingunder40MEASUREnav><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature" shape=poly alt="" coords=3,5,28,5,28,19,3,19,3,15><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_volkswagen_gti_page_2" shape=poly alt="" coords=43,4,123,4,123,18,43,18,43,14><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_mini_john_cooper_works_page_3" shape=poly alt="" coords=136,4,260,4,260,18,136,18,136,14><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_nissan_370z_page_4" shape=poly alt="" coords=277,3,339,3,339,17,277,17,277,13><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_ford_mustang_gt_page_5" shape=poly alt="" coords=354,4,447,4,447,18,354,18,354,14><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2012_mazda_mx-5_miata_page_6" shape=poly alt="" coords=454,4,545,4,545,18,454,18,454,13><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/11q3/best-handling_car_for_less_than_40_000-feature/2011_mitsubishi_lancer_evolution_mr_page_7" shape=poly alt="" coords=3,22,164,22,164,36,3,36,3,32><AREA href="http://www.caranddriver.com/content/download/285252/4622853/version/1/file/Best-Handling-Specs-and-Performance2.pdf" shape=poly alt="" coords=176,21,437,21,437,35,176,35,176,31></MAP><TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=390><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>bar - You do not have permission to view this object.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Cayman Dynamics, C/D’s expert witness for special investigations, assembled an $80,000 instrument package to assess each test car’s response to controlled steering inputs. The sensor array consisted of four infrared height-measuring devices (one per corner); a strap-on steering wheel (to report steering angle, steering effort, and the steering-input rate); and a six-axis inertial sensor (signaling roll, pitch, and yaw rates plus lateral, longitudinal, and vertical accelerations). A VBox III data logger (sampling 100 times per second) recorded all sensor signals in sync with vehicle speed and position information while each car gradually accelerated from rest to the adhesion limit on a 300-foot-diameter skidpad. Reducing the data yielded the steering angle, steering effort, and body-roll-versus-lateral-acceleration curves shown here.
To quantify damping, we added a new procedure to this year’s best-handling competition. It examines how each car reacts to rapid steering inputs. Ideally, a vehicle’s springs, dampers, and anti-roll bars quickly check the roll, pitch, and yaw motion of the car following a disturbance from steering, acceleration, braking, bumps, or any combination of the four inputs. The general term used to describe how well the suspension handles such disturbances is body control. To measure car-to-car damping differences, Cayman drove each test car at 70 mph while applying sinusoidal steering inputs of varying magnitude and frequency. The dynamic responses recorded by the instruments were then analyzed to determine the relative roll-damping figures reported here and in our results chart.
The Mustang GT, at the low end of the scale, was assigned an index figure of 1.00, while the Mitsubishi Evo, with 54-percent greater damping, has a figure of 1.54. The roll-damping indexes of the four other test cars fall between these two extremes.
<TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=378><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>Besthandle-graph-key-2 - You do not have permission to view this object.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=184><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>Besthandle-graph-1 - You do not have permission to view this object.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=128><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>Besthandle-graph-2 - You do not have permission to view this object.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=221><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=322><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 08:43 AM
  #3  
Enzo354's Avatar
STILL SLOW
Monte Of The Month -- May 2010
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,082
From: Nubraska
10 Year Member
Default

370!!!!
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
Space's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,585
From: Beach`in Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Enzo354
370!!!!

Hi Brock Why did you choose a 370Z
I do like the new 2012 update


It's still outa my Auto Budget


 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- August 2014
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 25,145
From: Southeast PA
15 Year Member
Default

I'd honestly probably choose the Mustang out of that list.

Although the Miata would be pretty fun to drive.
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 09:28 AM
  #6  
Space's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33,585
From: Beach`in Florida
Default

Originally Posted by ChibiBlackSheep
I'd honestly probably choose the Mustang out of that list.

Although the Miata would be pretty fun to drive.

Hi `Mod Mike, I was surprised to see the Mustang G.T. do so well, and surprised the MX5 beat it..

I also wish they would've had a Camaro S.S. in this test
I do like the MX5 (Miata) & they are a blast to drive. My g/f had a old one & we all drove it hard & it held up great. She would like to trade her Honda 4 another one : ), but she dreams as much as I `do & that's a lot

At present, I can't afford any of the above, but I like to keep up with what's out there in the auto market 4-Sure...
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 11:16 AM
  #7  
lougreen03's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- March 2013
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,442
From: michigan
Default

The nissan is a nice looking car with good power.
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #8  
xxtheshockerxx's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- October 2011
Monte Of The Month -- July 2014
RED DEVIL
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,982
From: Madrid, Iowa
Default

i went with the Evo. Just cus i think they are pretty cool
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 01:04 PM
  #9  
03JGMonte's Avatar

Monte Of The Month - March 2010
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 15,217
From: Missouri
Default

Id go with the evo cuz there a blast to drive, but id take my gto over em all with my suspension ive got on it, handles insainly good
 
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 01:09 PM
  #10  
Mr.Monte's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,404
From: Clearwater, Florida
5 Year Member
Default

id have to go with mustang alll the wayy.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM.