Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

Higher Octane Gas = Better Performance +MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-30-2013 | 09:13 PM
owens91's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Monte Of The Month -- October 2014
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,335
From: philly pa
10 Year Member
Default Higher Octane Gas = Better Performance +MPG

i was watching Something on the speed channel where basically they ran a truck on a dino with 87 octane gas and then they ran it again with 93 octane gas and when they put the stats together the 93 octane gas had found to made a bit more horsepower and increased MPG...i was basically wondering has anyone have experience with this experiment?
 
  #2  
Old 07-30-2013 | 09:18 PM
TMoney's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 555
From: CT
5 Year Member
Default

I was just wondering the same thing

Would like to hear from some people if it actually works and is worth it
 
  #3  
Old 07-30-2013 | 09:25 PM
turbo monte's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- July 2012
Monte Of The Month -- August 2016
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,056
From: ford city, pa
10 Year Member
Default

idk for certain on the mpg but it will help ever so slightly with performance. i will say when i would run higher octane fuel the car was more responsive and seemed to go further on a tank of gas but i never actually checked to verify. but in the end it probably averages to about the same because even if you go a little further you paid more to fill up with premium...
 
  #4  
Old 07-30-2013 | 09:32 PM
Leprechaun93's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- June 2013
Monte Of The Month -- December 2015
3 Year Member1 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 10,385
From: Middletown, NY
5 Year Member
Default

Don't waste you money, this argument has been had many times, if your car calls for 87, use it. Higher octane is really only going to benefit higher performance engines and fuel economy is probably just a waste of time.
 
  #5  
Old 07-30-2013 | 10:19 PM
owens91's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Monte Of The Month -- October 2014
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,335
From: philly pa
10 Year Member
Default

i normally use 87, but when its time to fill up, iwill use 93, im really curious on this
 
  #6  
Old 07-30-2013 | 10:33 PM
iMuf's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 872
Default

I normally run 87 octane but I will run 93 octane every 4 or 5 fill ups. I do notice that the car does feel more responsive and it does go a little further on a tank which as some people have said on here, it's not much and really doesn't make a difference.
 
  #7  
Old 07-30-2013 | 10:43 PM
MnteCrloSS47's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- November 2012
Monte Of The Month -- June 2014
Monte Of The Month -- July 2016
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,607
From: Vestal NY
10 Year Member
Default

"
Unless your engine is knocking, buying higher octane gasoline is a waste of money. Premium gas costs 15 to 20 cents per gallon more than regular. That can add up to $100 or more a year in extra costs. Studies indicate that altogether, drivers may be spending hundreds of millions of dollars each year for higher octane gas than they need.
It may seem like buying higher octane “premium” gas is like giving your car a treat, or boosting its performance. But take note: the recommended gasoline for most cars is regular octane. In fact, in most cases, using a higher octane gasoline than your owner's manual recommends offers absolutely no benefit. It won't make your car perform better, go faster, get better mileage, or run cleaner. Your best bet: listen to your owner's manual.
The only time you might need to switch to a higher octane level is if your car engine knocks when you use the recommended fuel. This happens to a small percentage of cars."
 
  #8  
Old 07-30-2013 | 11:29 PM
ZIPPY02's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- May 2012
Monte Of The Year 2012
Monte Of The Month -- February 2017
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,908
From: Mountains of Utah
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by turbo monte
idk for certain on the mpg but it will help ever so slightly with performance. i will say when i would run higher octane fuel the car was more responsive and seemed to go further on a tank of gas but i never actually checked to verify. but in the end it probably averages to about the same because even if you go a little further you paid more to fill up with premium...
John said it all, the additional money you pay for premium could have been spent of 85 and you could have bought more fuel and went even further. Run 85 if your Monte is happy with it...
 
  #9  
Old 07-31-2013 | 09:20 AM
VictoryRedSled's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 268
From: South of Indianapolis
Default

i feel that even with higher octane gas, if you just do it once, you wont notice any difference because wont the car be used to running on lower octane, thus it would need to be filled with a few tanks of premium before it started adjusting to the higher octane?
 
  #10  
Old 07-31-2013 | 09:25 AM
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- August 2014
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 25,137
From: Southeast PA
15 Year Member
Default

It's not worth it.

The only time it is beneficial is if your car is TUNED to burn higher octane fuel. Your stock computer will make minor adjustments, but you are just going to have extra unburnt fuel in the system.

I usually don't listen to the recommendation for engines with high compression (like above 11:1). I feel higher compression engines benefit from the higher octane. Most of those engines also have 2 fuel tables for the different octanes too.

In the case of the truck. It probably had a problem internally, and it was causing knock. One way to defuse knock is to use a higher octane. Knock will pull timing and slow you down, if the higher octane stopped the knock, it wasn't pulling the timing so he had a few extra HP (IN COMPARISON). Really that's the HP he should have had on a knock-free run on 87. He would have to try to see where the problem is and get it fixed properly lol
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.