Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

drove a 2006 impala ss 5.3l today...wasn't that impressed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 04-17-2008, 02:52 AM
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Posts: 126
Default RE: drove a 2006 impala ss 5.3l today...wasn't that impressed

Ok, I'm new to this forum. I just figured out this is a year old. But it was a good one.
 
  #22  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:13 AM
Taz's Avatar
Taz
Taz is offline

Monte Of The Month -- March 2014
15 Year Member
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Windsor
Posts: 18,646
Default RE: drove a 2006 impala ss 5.3l today...wasn't that impressed

(post deleted. Have a nice day.)
 
  #23  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:17 AM
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: wouldnt u like to know
Posts: 2,576
Default RE: drove a 2006 impala ss 5.3l today...wasn't that impressed

the main reason the 3.9 has 242 hp is because of the variable intake. im not sure youd be able to bolt a sc to something like that without having to go down to a stock manifold. and then of course you lose the main reason you put out 242hp. it would be sick interesting to see tho if it can bedone
 
  #24  
Old 04-17-2008, 08:15 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 784
Default RE: drove a 2006 impala ss 5.3l today...wasn't that impressed

I know this is waaaay late, and the thread kind of strayed...lol....but what about gear ratios? If the Impala is geared higher than the S/C MC, then wouldn't the MC have better acceleration because of the lower gear, but lose out on top end? (I'm JUST learning about how gearing works...lol) I don't know the gear ratios right off the top of my head though.
 
  #25  
Old 04-17-2008, 12:27 PM
BLACK ATTACK's Avatar
Photobucket
Monte Of The Month -- December 2007
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 764
Default RE: drove a 2006 impala ss 5.3l today...wasn't that impressed

Being someone that sold the Impala SS, Monte Carlo SS, Pontiac GXP, Pontiac GTO, Corvettes, SSR, Malibu SS, Cobalt SS, I think I have a good understanding of all these cars.

I have driven the Monte Carlo SS 3.8 Supercharger, and the 5.3 V8. I also know the different between when the cars are running 93 octane and 89 octane and 87 octane gas. A lot of dealerships use 87, even in theirHigh-performance vehicles -- Sad but true. While it is true you can spin the tires easier on the SS 3.8SC, but a lot of that has to do with the Tire Size and the Traction Control Systems. But we use to race all the cars (sorry to inform you of that), especially the High-Performance cars to see what each could do and which was truly faster. We even had a 1/16, 1/8, and 1/4-mile markers we put along the road. I will tell you that a Cobalt SS will tear the doors off all the high-performance cars in the 1/16 of a mile.

I will also tell you, the 3.8SC will kick the 5.3SS in the 1/16 to 1/8 mile, but after that, that V8 blows it away. The Cobalt SS and the Monte SS 3.8SCare a great race, but the 3.8SC wins, but it is a close race. In all the races we did, the 5.3SS beat the 3.8SS by at least three cars lengths in the quarter.

I am more impressed with the Cobalt SS. Pound for pound, HP for HP, Price for Price, theCobalt SS is theBAD TO THE BONE winner.

 
  #26  
Old 04-19-2008, 02:23 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 267
Default RE: drove a 2006 impala ss 5.3l today...wasn't that impressed

Someone always have somethig better than someone else. Can't we all just appriciate what we have and count our blessings we are not driving POS's? I could be a lot worse.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boxman420
Tires/Rims/Suspension
6
10-20-2012 12:14 PM
Absolutpolack
General Monte Carlo Talk
12
05-30-2012 08:40 AM
thomasnchy
Off Topic
6
08-31-2008 08:19 PM
shmedley
General Monte Carlo Talk
38
03-15-2007 11:11 PM
2006MonteCarlo
General Monte Carlo Talk
2
10-30-2006 08:40 AM



Quick Reply: drove a 2006 impala ss 5.3l today...wasn't that impressed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.