Me thinks I'm in Duane's head now! He gonna buckle and start picking Kvapil, Gilliland and Peblo every week - he's freaking out!

I don't think the tie-breaker rule means to much and I'm more than happy to share victoy lane *cough*MOTM*cough*

 

Ah huh.... I started out 21st in points, I'm up to 2nd in 4 weeks, and I'm freaking out over a Jr fan....



You just keep on a dreaming, Brent....

 

I say leave it till the end of the segment and go from there. I was doing consistently well until I went all in on Carl, so I probably won't go all in for a while unless it's just too hard to pass up. I just have to do a better job of picking which tracks I attempt that on. I knew Bristol was a risk but I did it anyway. However, based on a lot of the usual strong runners doing poorly at Bristol, I probably wouldn't have done much better had I picked 3 different drivers. So I didn't really come out all that much worse than I likely would have cause I would at least have picked Biffle and Carl.

 

I think I will vote for revert back but not until segment 1 is over and call it a trial run. It does take more skill to pick 3 I think. I too won with an all in but think that is just too easy.

 

KISS : Keep it simple stupid.

I voted to eliminate the "allin" rule....as well as the dbl down....

Pick 3 drivers .... and live with the results....

That way its all about doing your home work from track to track.....
And yes if "Junior" wins 1 or more.....(Hail Mary Pass)....Guess what happens if you pick him as your first pick?

Im just saying:

This way you could also make huge gains by accumulative postions of your picks....

That makes it fair for "EVERYONE"...

Thats my 2 cents...