Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

Old May 5, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #11  
Bigg J's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,631
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

Yeah, I would say so. Just be prepared for lots of story, lots of emotion, and a good amount of action. The storyline does not directly follow the comic books, (which these movies never have), but I still enjoyed it.
 
Old May 5, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #12  
wiz kidd's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- March 2007
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,264
From: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

yah, i never read the comics...i just really enjoyed the movies
 
Old May 5, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #13  
zipsayain's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 229
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

Ok it not as good as the first two and yet it is. But the action is really good. But if you are a spiderman fan , you will enjoy it. Plus don't every take someone's word for it. Just go and see it for yourself. Just because someone dislike it. doesn't mean you will two.

But I enjoyed it. [sm=smiley20.gif][sm=smiley20.gif]


O yeah the preview for fantatic four, looks good. Looks like theres going to alot of more action in this one.
 
Old May 5, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #14  
rj's Avatar
rj
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,482
From: Southwestern OH
15 Year Member
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

So................ go see it or not?

I noticed the movies over at the mall were packed this afternoon. Must be because of Spiderman 3 showing over there.

 
Old May 6, 2007 | 12:24 AM
  #15  
Bigg J's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,631
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

Yeah,I say go for it. Like zip said, the previews are cool.I saw 2 new trailers for Fantastic 4, in one, you can hear Lawrence Fishburne's voice as the Surfer.
 
Old May 6, 2007 | 12:57 AM
  #16  
c6g2's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 124
From:
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

I plan on seeing it. I liked the first 2 movies. I don't expect much from these movies other than pure entertainment. They all tend to be on the cheesy side. And there's certainly nothing wrong with seeing MJ



[IMG]local://upfiles/2446/7C623F1419CE40658F980A8D1F8EC5C4.jpg[/IMG]
 
Old May 6, 2007 | 01:27 AM
  #17  
Bigg J's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,631
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

Well, I'm not much for blondes, but Gwen Stacy isWAY hotter than MJ in this movie IMHO!!

(not the best pic, but you get the idea)


[IMG]local://upfiles/335/9AB1EAC859EF44D582C0837DA93D16BB.jpg[/IMG]
 
Old May 6, 2007 | 01:38 AM
  #18  
c6g2's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 124
From:
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

ORIGINAL: Bigg J

Well, I'm not much for blondes, but Gwen Stacy isWAY hotter than MJ in this movie IMHO!!

(not the best pic, but you get the idea)


[IMG]local://upfiles/335/9AB1EAC859EF44D582C0837DA93D16BB.jpg[/IMG]
See now, it's getting better all the time. There's another reason to see the new Spider-man movie[8D]
 
Old May 6, 2007 | 07:43 PM
  #19  
wiz kidd's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- March 2007
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,264
From: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

yah i'll have to see them in the movies...but from the pics kirsten looks way hotter...
i just finished downloading the movie..hope to watch soon
 
Old May 6, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #20  
rj's Avatar
rj
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,482
From: Southwestern OH
15 Year Member
Default RE: SPIDERMAN 3= BAD

but Gwen Stacy isWAY hotter than MJ in this movie IMHO!!

So they FINALLY acknowledge Gwenolyn in Peter Parker's life in the Spiderman movies?


 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.