Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

New/Comeback Vehicles of 2013

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 09:09 PM
  #31  
JuniorCar's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- January 2013
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,612
From: London, Ontario
15 Year Member
Default

What would you describe about these cars that is different (other then the obvious color)?




Am I the only one who see's the similiarities?

I am reminded of a really old thread>>>

link here >> https://montecarloforum.com/forum/of...liarity-14559/

or another:
link here >> https://montecarloforum.com/forum/of...liarity-14611/
 

Last edited by JuniorCar; Jan 7, 2012 at 09:31 PM.
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 09:13 PM
  #32  
StrongTakeover's Avatar
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 360
From: Home: Chicago,IL School: Macomb,IL
Default

yeah I def see the similarities!!! such a big price difference between the two with the same look on the outside just doesn't seem fair.... but as long as there making money who cares right lol
 
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 09:16 PM
  #33  
03JGMonte's Avatar

Monte Of The Month - March 2010
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 15,217
From: Missouri
Default

The rims are different
 
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 09:30 PM
  #34  
tps221's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,043
From: massachusetts
Default

thats because its a photo shopped picture of a malibu back end strectched with sonic headlights
 
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 09:40 PM
  #35  
JuniorCar's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- January 2013
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,612
From: London, Ontario
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by tps221
thats because its a photo shopped picture of a malibu back end strectched with sonic headlights
I sure hope your right!
 
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 09:46 PM
  #36  
Taz's Avatar
Taz

Monte Of The Month -- March 2014
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 18,660
From: Windsor
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by JuniorCar
What would you describe about these cars that is different (other then the obvious color)?




Am I the only one who see's the similiarities?

I am reminded of a really old thread>>>

link here >> https://montecarloforum.com/forum/of...liarity-14559/

or another:
link here >> https://montecarloforum.com/forum/of...liarity-14611/

They may look similar at first glance. But I see all kinds of differences.

But first let me just point out the fact that the Impala is a photoshopped concept of the car. We don't know if that's what it will actually look like. With that in mind...

The headlight assy is different. The grill is shorter above the bowtie. And the hood extends all the way to include the top edge of the grill. Unlike the Malibu.

The rear door and pillar are different.

The front bumper/fog light area on the Impala picture looks to be wrong when you look closely at the spy pictures of the actual (disguised) Impala. In the spy pictures, you can see thin rectangular turn signal lights where the huge fog light openings are in the photoshop picture.
 
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 11:07 PM
  #37  
BlackRainSS's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,868
From: Iowa
Default

I'm not a huge fan of impalas but it dosent look too bad.
 
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 11:55 PM
  #38  
StrongTakeover's Avatar
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 360
From: Home: Chicago,IL School: Macomb,IL
Default

Originally Posted by Taz
They may look similar at first glance. But I see all kinds of differences.

But first let me just point out the fact that the Impala is a photoshopped concept of the car. We don't know if that's what it will actually look like. With that in mind...

The headlight assy is different. The grill is shorter above the bowtie. And the hood extends all the way to include the top edge of the grill. Unlike the Malibu.

The rear door and pillar are different.

The front bumper/fog light area on the Impala picture looks to be wrong when you look closely at the spy pictures of the actual (disguised) Impala. In the spy pictures, you can see thin rectangular turn signal lights where the huge fog light openings are in the photoshop picture.
well now i feel like a dumb*** after taz came in and schooled my *** good observations though
 
Old Jan 8, 2012 | 12:53 AM
  #39  
montechick's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 290
From: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
Default

I dont like the look of either of the chevys at all. Now the sexy charger on the other hand.. drool so nice! Im actually thinking when the monte decides to depart me, I'll be getting a new charger with the 3.6 tho. I never understand what the big deal is about vipers. i personally hate driving them ( work at dodge and we have a 2011 Final edition SRT, we had a 2005, 1995 as well) pain in the *** to get into, cramped interiors, the interiors are actually old designs to, even the stereo. and they got bubble butts, pain to back in and out of the shop and into showrooms
 
Old Jan 9, 2012 | 08:04 AM
  #40  
d8lejrmonte's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 183
From: williamsburg va
Default

Originally Posted by 03JGMonte
so was the acr-x a track only car too?
Camaro SSX and Corvette Z06X – Track Ready and Deadly Serious - LSXTV.com
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.