Jacko not guilty???????
#4
06-13-2005, 10:18 PM
RE: Jacko not guilty???????
Oh, just a quick question, i know its not on the subject, but this is for off topic right? whats this whole Moderator thing? and I saw someone who is an Administrator, how did you get those "positions"? not like i want to or anything, i was just curious.
#6
06-14-2005, 02:42 AM
RE: Jacko not guilty???????
I think alot of us were so easily able to convict him because we know how wacked out a man has to be to think it's ok to have children sleep in his bed with him, so we figure it's within the realm of reality for him to do such a thing. Looks like the prosecution didn't have enough evidence/facts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of any of the charges against him. I can't judge thier decision cause I don't know the half of the evidence presented in the case, I just hope he doesn't have anymore sleep overs and parents don't send their kids to spend time with him. Hopefully he can get on with his life, as much as possible. I think he's always gonna have this stigma though, no matter what.
#7
06-14-2005, 03:01 AM
RE: Jacko not guilty???????
ORIGINAL: 04MonteLS
I think alot of us were so easily able to convict him because we know how wacked out a man has to be to think it's ok to have children sleep in his bed with him, so we figure it's within the realm of reality for him to do such a thing. Looks like the prosecution didn't have enough evidence/facts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of any of the charges against him. I can't judge thier decision cause I don't know the half of the evidence presented in the case, I just hope he doesn't have anymore sleep overs and parents don't send their kids to spend time with him. Hopefully he can get on with his life, as much as possible. I think he's always gonna have this stigma though, no matter what.
I think alot of us were so easily able to convict him because we know how wacked out a man has to be to think it's ok to have children sleep in his bed with him, so we figure it's within the realm of reality for him to do such a thing. Looks like the prosecution didn't have enough evidence/facts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of any of the charges against him. I can't judge thier decision cause I don't know the half of the evidence presented in the case, I just hope he doesn't have anymore sleep overs and parents don't send their kids to spend time with him. Hopefully he can get on with his life, as much as possible. I think he's always gonna have this stigma though, no matter what.
#8
06-14-2005, 03:09 AM
RE: Jacko not guilty???????
ORIGINAL: SoCalSS
I completely agree, and i wouldnt be surprised if in the future some OTHER kid or parent complains about something wacko jacko did. Whether they claim it's something that happened after these current ones, or just another child that might have been able to "break the case". Either way, warpath was right, money deffinitely talks.
ORIGINAL: 04MonteLS
I think alot of us were so easily able to convict him because we know how wacked out a man has to be to think it's ok to have children sleep in his bed with him, so we figure it's within the realm of reality for him to do such a thing. Looks like the prosecution didn't have enough evidence/facts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of any of the charges against him. I can't judge thier decision cause I don't know the half of the evidence presented in the case, I just hope he doesn't have anymore sleep overs and parents don't send their kids to spend time with him. Hopefully he can get on with his life, as much as possible. I think he's always gonna have this stigma though, no matter what.
I think alot of us were so easily able to convict him because we know how wacked out a man has to be to think it's ok to have children sleep in his bed with him, so we figure it's within the realm of reality for him to do such a thing. Looks like the prosecution didn't have enough evidence/facts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of any of the charges against him. I can't judge thier decision cause I don't know the half of the evidence presented in the case, I just hope he doesn't have anymore sleep overs and parents don't send their kids to spend time with him. Hopefully he can get on with his life, as much as possible. I think he's always gonna have this stigma though, no matter what.
#9
06-14-2005, 03:38 AM
RE: Jacko not guilty???????
ORIGINAL: 04MonteLS
I think the timing of the charges hurt, the mom's history and character hurt, and alot of experts felt the child looked coached in his video taped statements that were given to police when the charges first came about.
ORIGINAL: SoCalSS
I completely agree, and i wouldnt be surprised if in the future some OTHER kid or parent complains about something wacko jacko did. Whether they claim it's something that happened after these current ones, or just another child that might have been able to "break the case". Either way, warpath was right, money deffinitely talks.
ORIGINAL: 04MonteLS
I think alot of us were so easily able to convict him because we know how wacked out a man has to be to think it's ok to have children sleep in his bed with him, so we figure it's within the realm of reality for him to do such a thing. Looks like the prosecution didn't have enough evidence/facts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of any of the charges against him. I can't judge thier decision cause I don't know the half of the evidence presented in the case, I just hope he doesn't have anymore sleep overs and parents don't send their kids to spend time with him. Hopefully he can get on with his life, as much as possible. I think he's always gonna have this stigma though, no matter what.
I think alot of us were so easily able to convict him because we know how wacked out a man has to be to think it's ok to have children sleep in his bed with him, so we figure it's within the realm of reality for him to do such a thing. Looks like the prosecution didn't have enough evidence/facts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of any of the charges against him. I can't judge thier decision cause I don't know the half of the evidence presented in the case, I just hope he doesn't have anymore sleep overs and parents don't send their kids to spend time with him. Hopefully he can get on with his life, as much as possible. I think he's always gonna have this stigma though, no matter what.
#10
06-14-2005, 03:42 AM
RE: Jacko not guilty???????
ORIGINAL: SoCalSS
There were a lot of deciding factors. just like with O.J. but come on, who wants to be the one responsible for sending micheal jackson so prison? I know I wouldnt want to be. I mean, he made thriller.
There were a lot of deciding factors. just like with O.J. but come on, who wants to be the one responsible for sending micheal jackson so prison? I know I wouldnt want to be. I mean, he made thriller.