Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

Emissions Problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 01-03-2012 | 05:47 PM
mousehousemoparman's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,226
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by ChibiBlackSheep
Cat-Back exhausts DO NOTHING for emissions. I could see a law not being able to change out the Catalytic, but a cat-back?
The EPA and a few other groups want us all riding bicycles that no pollutants unless you pass gas as you pedal. In an effort to reach that goal they are attempting to legislate what can be done to a car by its owner. They have already legislated that you can not buy a used catalitic converter to put on your car. You must buy new and if new is not available you have to junk the car. This is their way of reducing the numbers of used cars on the road as was the popular clunker bill a few years ago. All the cars that were traded in using the clunker bill had to be junked. The only parts that were allowed off of them was what was needed to make it crushable. The EPA is out of control and things will only get worse. Barak Obama supports the efforts of the EPA. I voted for him in 08 but will not do so again.
 
  #12  
Old 01-03-2012 | 06:02 PM
SupplySgt's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,635
From: Central Oklahoma
5 Year Member
Default

How did they get the idea that a cat-back affects emissions??? That's just crazy. And only on 96 or newer? Geeze all they do is plug in to the OBD port anyway.
 
  #13  
Old 01-03-2012 | 06:13 PM
mousehousemoparman's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,226
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by SupplySgt
How did they get the idea that a cat-back affects emissions??? That's just crazy. And only on 96 or newer? Geeze all they do is plug in to the OBD port anyway.
They are mindless idiots. They have no clue how cars run. They just want to make sure that no one changes anything from the way it left the assembly line. They have already mandated how they are built there.
 

Last edited by mousehousemoparman; 01-03-2012 at 06:16 PM.
  #14  
Old 01-03-2012 | 06:16 PM
Enzo354's Avatar
STILL SLOW
Monte Of The Month -- May 2010
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,082
From: Nubraska
10 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by mousehousemoparman
The EPA and a few other groups want us all riding bicycles that no pollutants unless you pass gas as you pedal. In an effort to reach that goal they are attempting to legislate what can be done to a car by its owner. They have already legislated that you can not buy a used catalitic converter to put on your car. You must buy new and if new is not available you have to junk the car. This is their way of reducing the numbers of used cars on the road as was the popular clunker bill a few years ago. All the cars that were traded in using the clunker bill had to be junked. The only parts that were allowed off of them was what was needed to make it crushable. The EPA is out of control and things will only get worse. Barak Obama supports the efforts of the EPA. I voted for him in 08 but will not do so again.
If the EPA got their way, we wouldn't even have bicycles. Honestly I will continue to mod my car the way I want to no matter what the big mans says. If I can't have freedom of speech, I can sure have freedom to do what I please with what I buy. Come on, tell me I can't put a fireplace in my house.
 
  #15  
Old 01-03-2012 | 06:19 PM
SupplySgt's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,635
From: Central Oklahoma
5 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by mousehousemoparman
They are mindless idiots. They have no clue how cars run. They just want to make sure that no one changes anything from the way it left the assembly line. They have already mandated how they are built there.
Sad part is that most of my mods are designed to make it more efficient, and therefore get better fuel mileage. I always get better fuel mileage than it did bone stock when I get the chance to mod a car. You'd think that would make the tree huggers happy but I guess as long as we are using anything other than our feet to get around then they'll never be happy.
 
  #16  
Old 01-03-2012 | 06:30 PM
DRuben's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 677
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
10 Year Member
Default

Who would pass this bill? I mean we paid for our cars, we should have the freedom to do what we want. The only exception I would go for is the catalytic converter. Keep the catalytic converter law that we have in order to reduce emissions.
 
  #17  
Old 01-03-2012 | 09:19 PM
mousehousemoparman's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,226
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by DRuben
Who would pass this bill? I mean we paid for our cars, we should have the freedom to do what we want. The only exception I would go for is the catalytic converter. Keep the catalytic converter law that we have in order to reduce emissions.
I agree completely except for the cat Converter. If you can make your car run clean without that added weight then you should be able to run without it. As it is now a garage can not remove a cat from a car but a car owner can. I eliminated them from many of my Mopars. We don't have vehicle inspections here in Florida. They eliminated them about twenty years ago because of rampant corruption in the system from what I was told. With out the state inspections we do have a few junks on the road but they are not that many. We also don't have the structural rust issues here that are in other parts of the country but we do have rust issues here.
 
  #18  
Old 01-03-2012 | 09:29 PM
mousehousemoparman's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,226
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Enzo354
If the EPA got their way, we wouldn't even have bicycles. Honestly I will continue to mod my car the way I want to no matter what the big mans says. If I can't have freedom of speech, I can sure have freedom to do what I please with what I buy. Come on, tell me I can't put a fireplace in my house.
The EPA has even regulated the emissions from fire places. You can install a fireplace if it is EPA approved. They have even begun regulating lawn mower emissions. Expect to see fuel injection and a cat converter in the near future on lawn mowers.
 
  #19  
Old 01-03-2012 | 09:43 PM
03JGMonte's Avatar

Monte Of The Month - March 2010
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 15,217
From: Missouri
Default

EPA is just a huge wast of money, should just get rid of it & wed have more money
 
  #20  
Old 01-03-2012 | 10:38 PM
Budsjlm's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- September 2012
Monte Of The Month -- February 2016
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,758
From: Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota
15 Year Member
Default

Thank god for living in a state with no inspection, my Saturn would fail as soon as it was started and the giant cloud of blue smoke came pouring out the exhaust... If I had to pay to have that fixed I would be a unhapy man.. would mean basicly a complete teardown all becuase Saturn did no think to drill oil relief holes in the oil control ring land
 


Quick Reply: Emissions Problems



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 PM.