a Debate about the 1994 Impala SS
a buddy and I were talking about this can and we disagreed. He said it was the last of the 1st Gen muscle cars, I said it was the start of the 2nd gen.
which do you see?
which do you see?
What I see is the Muscle cars started in the 60's 63,64, to 72 and that was the last of the that era with Factory HP on up to 375 or better. I owned several of them.
Unfortunately it spoiled me and I can't look at a front wheel drive but anything more than a family car. The Monte SS are good looking cars but the last on my list for a Race Car in Front wheel drive.
Body style wise I love them, bringing back the Monte in 94 to Nascar was a good idea, they survived for along time. Then the Impala took over.
Now I see only 2 Chevy muscle cars 1. the Camaro, 2. the Corvette. other brands the Mustang, and the Challengers. Anything else doesn't get a mention.
All that said if you take into part that the Muscle Car era ended in 1972 and got a rebirth in 1994 with the Impala. You could say that it is a 2nd Generation Muscle Car.



That just my realization of what it means to me.

Hope that helps some!?!?!
I don't really understand how a 90s impala would be lumped in with the old cars though. Sure it's big and rwd, but so is a 300c, charger, marauder, etc, and I sure wouldn't call any of them old generation muscle either.
I would personally draw the line with the introduction of electronic port fuel injection, with either a newer generation or subset for the new DI muscle cars.
Regardless how you divide them, I just hope the current trends continue!
Last edited by bumpin96monte; Feb 24, 2016 at 09:54 PM.
That's a good point, I wasn't thinking of it in terms of just the impala line. I guess I could see that making more sense if you were just looking at the impala generations and your only qualifier was rwd.










