Off Topic A place to kick back and discuss non-Monte Carlo related subjects. Just about anything goes.

Cash $$$ 4 Clunkers~> WoW TaxPayers ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-10-2009, 01:11 PM
Space's Avatar
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Beach`in Florida
Posts: 33,585
Question Cash $$$ 4 Clunkers~> WoW TaxPayers ?

Cash For Clunkers Bill: House Passes, We Analyze

By Matt Hardigree, 6:25 PM on Tue Jun 9 2009, 10,063 views



The Community Assistance to Recycle and Save Act (CARS Act), more commonly known as the Cash for Clunkers bill, passed the U.S. House of Representatives moments ago by a vote of 298-to-119. So how's it work?
The concept behind "cash for clunkers" as practiced by both the House and Senate versions of the bill, as well as successfully in other countries, is to create demand for new cars and raise fuel efficiency standards by encouraging consumers to trade in their gas guzzling "clunkers" for more efficient vehicles and, as an incentive, to give them cash.
The compromise House version of the CARS Act (HR 2751) proposes $3,500 or $4,500 vouchers for consumers interested in trading up to a more efficient vehicle. Once the program is enacted you'll have approximately one year to make the move. The hope is the Act will increase new vehicle sales by one million units in the first year at a time when the market is expected to experience sales of less than 10 million. The bill still has to go to the Senate, where it's expected some tweaks will be made before a final bill goes to the President.
How do you qualify for the voucher?
For Passenger Cars
If you have a passenger automobile not classified as a truck you qualify for a $3,500 credit if you trade in a less efficient vehicle for one with a combined fuel economy value at least 4 MPG higher that costs less than $45,000. The passenger car being trading in has to get 18 MPG or less, meaning you can't trade in a first generation Prius for a newer one. Additionally, the new vehicle has to get 22 MPG or better. In order to qualify for $4,500 you need to buy a vehicle that gets 10 MPG better combined than your trade-in.
For Light Duty Truck And SUVs
If you decide you want to trade in your category 1 light truck or SUV you need to find a new vehicle capable of getting a combined MPG of better than 18 MPG. If the new vehicle gets 2 MPG better you're eligible for $3,500. If you want the full $4,500 you need to find a new truck capable of getting a combined mileage 5 MPG higher.
For Heavy Duty Trucks And Vans
If you have a large Class 1 truck you're eligible for a $3,500 voucher if you trade up for one capable of getting at least 15 MPG combined and gets 1 MPG combined. For $4,500 the new vehicle will also have to provide performance 2 MPG or better than the trade in.
For Work Trucks
The best you can get for trading up to a Class 2 truck like a Ford F-250, is $3,500. In order to get this voucher you need to be trading in a vehicle with a model year older than 2001 for a new truck of smaller or similar size. Because of recent federal regulation changes, it's assumed the new truck is going to have a higher fuel economy.
Trading Up
After receiving questions about this from commenters, we contacted the sponsoring Congresswoman's staff and they assured us you can trade up from a truck or SUV to a passenger car (or smaller truck) assuming the new vehicles meets the minimum requirements (18 MPG or better, under $45,000) and is more efficient than the trade-in.
No Cheating
Those wishing to buy an older junked car for $200 and trade it in for $4,500 towards a new car are going to be dissapointed. The bill requires you to own and operate the car for more than a year before trading it in and it has to be in drivable condition, meaning the clunker can't be overly clunky.
No Old Cars
Many car enthusiasts fearful someone will trade in a rare classic will applaud the section limiting the cars to those produced in model year 1985 or after. Of course, this wasn't done for the sake of car fans. They can't easily determine the combined fuel economy of vehicles before the date because the EPA didn't track this data.
To The Crusher!
The law is very explicit on this point: the car has to be crushed. No salvaging it. No retitling it. No shipping it off to another country. The car has to be crushed and the title has to be transferred. Anyone trying to pass the voucher off and then resell the car could be penalized $15,000 per violation. However, you can strip and sell any part of the car that isn't the engine block.
[Library Of Congress, Detroit News

MCF Member's...What do you think of
Bill/Article ? ? ?
Post your thoughts....It's your $'s
 
  #2  
Old 06-10-2009, 01:18 PM
RickAKATed10's Avatar
Photobucket
Monte Of The Month -- August 2009
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Highland, IN
Posts: 5,827
Default

IDK. Even after reading about it earlier I'm still a bit confused about how it work. Does it mean I can trade in my gas guzzler SS for a 2LT Camaro and get this credit? I'm still a bit confused.
 
  #3  
Old 06-10-2009, 01:50 PM
The Popcorn King's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- July 2009
I'M NOT OLD, I'M JUST WELL MARINATED.
5 Year Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 6,996
Default

Originally Posted by KidSpace
However, you can strip and sell any part of the car that isn't the engine block.
But what if you need a good block to rebuild for your car and the donor car falls in that situation? Are we suppose to junk the car cause we cant have motors from those cars that would make a good replacement? Are we suppose to buy new one IF they decide to make more? It sure seams like its being driven to help the automakers with sales of new cars and not care is if the poor can afford it.

I guess you can either junk your present car to get a new one and get back into payments or take the bus cause you cant afford payments at all.


Originally Posted by RickAKATed10
IDK. Even after reading about it earlier I'm still a bit confused about how it work. Does it mean I can trade in my gas guzzler SS for a 2LT Camaro and get this credit? I'm still a bit confused.
Thats what it seams like Ted. If it boils down to it, I might trade my car in for a new Monte Carlo. IF i can find one a lot that is still new.
 
  #4  
Old 06-10-2009, 02:01 PM
Space's Avatar
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Beach`in Florida
Posts: 33,585
Default


LoL `Ted, JJ..
I heard about it on the radio, and then did a Google's
Search & found the above infor.
I'm always conFuZed & this one really confuses `me
But, then I remembered, It was written by
policitians that's why ? ?



...LOL - 4-Sure
 
  #5  
Old 06-10-2009, 02:36 PM
RickAKATed10's Avatar
Photobucket
Monte Of The Month -- August 2009
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Highland, IN
Posts: 5,827
Default

Originally Posted by JJsRYD
Thats what it seams like Ted. If it boils down to it, I might trade my car in for a new Monte Carlo. IF i can find one a lot that is still new.
Good luck finding a brand new 2007 Monte Carlo on any lot.

And I don't think my scenario would work.

2006 Monte Carlo SS: 18/28 mpg
2010 Camaro V6: 19/28 mpg

No deal.
 
  #6  
Old 06-10-2009, 02:42 PM
RickAKATed10's Avatar
Photobucket
Monte Of The Month -- August 2009
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Highland, IN
Posts: 5,827
  #7  
Old 06-10-2009, 03:29 PM
The Popcorn King's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- July 2009
I'M NOT OLD, I'M JUST WELL MARINATED.
5 Year Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 6,996
Default

I just checked and fuel millage for my car is all over the map. One site ( fueleconomy.gov) has my car with:

Fuel Type
Regular
MPG (city)
15
MPG (highway)
24
MPG (combined)
18

but Automotive.com has me at:

Fuel Economy: 20 MPG city / 29 MPG highway
I know that i am just about what Automotive.com said, but i am wondering where the other site got its numbers from.

But my main concern is when its going to need parts. I know that i plan on rebuilding my block next year, but will i be able to get what i need or will i be squeezed out cause of this bill?

Originally Posted by RickAKATed10

And I don't think my scenario would work.

2006 Monte Carlo SS: 18/28 mpg
2010 Camaro V6: 19/28 mpg

No deal.
It would if you got a Focus.
 

Last edited by The Popcorn King; 06-10-2009 at 03:31 PM.
  #8  
Old 06-10-2009, 04:20 PM
RickAKATed10's Avatar
Photobucket
Monte Of The Month -- August 2009
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Highland, IN
Posts: 5,827
Default

Lol!!
 
  #9  
Old 06-10-2009, 04:53 PM
JuniorCar's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- January 2013
15 Year Member
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 5,611
Default

I think this law is great!

Its not about actually trading your car - you have to crush it. Nobody get to buy it - up to $4500 to destroy your "gas guzzler". So you wouldn't be reasonably eligible if you car was worth more then $3500-$4500. You can't trade it in at all.

Its a great option I think. I'm used to driving crappy old cars the I drive to their very end anyways - not kidding. Car's come to me to die. I have never sold a car to anyone other then the wreckers. I only ever get $100.

The requirement of the new car is combined fuel economy (highway&city). I'm not quite sure how that's calculated, but I don't think a v6 camaro would be shy of 22 mpg combined.

It could hurt availability of recycled parts, but I guess that stimulates the economy too
 
  #10  
Old 06-10-2009, 06:23 PM
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,544
Default

I'll have to show this to my Mom tonight, she's been looking at a new car. The '93 Suburban with the 350 in it get about 17 on the highway now. I don't know what the rating was. Pretty sure Cobalts get over 4mpg more than an old 350 powered 'burban right?
 


Quick Reply: Cash $$$ 4 Clunkers~> WoW TaxPayers ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.