View Poll Results: Which one do you like ?
Camaro
5
71.43%
Mustang
2
28.57%
I'll post what I like for this cost/price
0
0%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll
=Pony-car face-off: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2016 Ford Mustang =
#1
09-30-2015, 08:04 AM
=Pony-car face-off: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2016 Ford Mustang =
Pony-car face-off: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2016 Ford Mustang
* Member's, Please post your favorite/ your choice ?
By Stephen Edelstein —
Related galleries
Mustang beware: 2016 Chevy Camaro SS will hit 60 in 4.0 seconds
Chevrolet announces pricing for its 2016 Camaro, starting at $26,695
Last year, Ford celebrated the 50th anniversary of its legendary “Pony Car” with the 2015 Mustang, a thoroughly reworked and reimagined model the company hopes will keep this ‘60s icon relevant well into the 21st century.
Greatness always attracts imitation, though. The original 1964 ½ Mustang created any entire “pony car” segment, which is still going strong today.
It took Chevrolet about two years to answer Ford with the first-generation 1967 Camaro, but its rival to the redesigned 2016 Mustang arrived much more quickly. Like its Ford foe, the 2016 Camaro aims for poise and efficiency as well as muscle.
So which will it be, 2016 Chevrolet Camaro, or 2016 Ford Mustang?
Exterior design
While both cars feature retro elements that nod to their long histories, the exterior designs of the Camaro and Mustang are both thoroughly modern.
The Mustang pulls an aesthetic J-turn from the previous generation, which slavishly copied the classic 1967-70 models. The 2016 model retains some signature Mustang cues like the grille, cab-rearward proportions, and segmented taillights with sequential turn signals, but everything is slickly sculpted.
That helps slim down what is actually a pretty large car, and provides better aerodynamics according to Ford. It also makes the Mustang more than just a pop culture reference.
At first glance, such a dramatic change looks much more significant than the relatively subtle changes Chevy made for the 2016 Camaro, but Ford was really playing catch up to the General Motors brand in a way.
When the Camaro was relaunched as a 2010 model, Chevy went with a more modern design than what Ford offered at the time. If nothing else, the 2016 Camaro proves the saying “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” but Chevy also runs the risk of its new model not appearing new enough.
Advantage: Mustang
Interior design, comfort, amenities
American manufacturers often get bashed for low-quality interiors, so the 2016 Camaro and Mustang have as much to prove here as they do in the more fun realm of performance.
Ford’s strategy was to bump up material quality while adding a few whimsical touches. The speedometer reads “ground speed,” and there are rocker switches on the center console that make you feel like a fighter pilot.
Chevy went in the opposite direction. Sure, the Camaro’s traditional “twin binnacle” gauge cluster remains, but you can stuff it with an available 8-inch display screen. Another 8-inch screen can be specified for the center stack to handle infotainment functions.
So which one is better? The Ford’s aeronautical theme looks cool now, but only time will tell if it stays that way, or just starts to feel cheesy. The Camaro may have gone too far down the tech route; the interior may seem less impressive on base models that don’t have the fancy screens, and the lack of mechanical parking brake takes away some of the fun of a rear-wheel drive sports car.
Advantage: Tie
Powertrain
The Camaro vs. Mustang rivalry really comes into focus under the hood. Ford 2016, powertrain lineups mirror each other, with both carmakers offering naturally-aspirated V6 and V8 and turbocharged four-cylinder engines.
Ford kicked off the four-cylinder trend with its 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine, which produces 310 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque. Its Chevy counterpart is a 2.0-liter unit with 275 hp and 295 lb-ft.
Adding a pair of cylinders, the 2016 Camaro gets an updated version of the previous car’s 3.6-liter V6, good for 335 hp and 284 lb-ft. The Mustang also continues with a holdover from its previous generation, a 3.7-liter V6 that produces 300 hp and 280 lb-ft.
Related: 2016 Ford Mustang gets hood-mounted turn signals and more
It’s worth noting that Chevy will make its four-cylinder engine standard on the Camaro, while the cheapest Mustangs ship with Ford’s V6.
Of course, muscle cars like the Camaro and Mustang are all about big, loud V8s, and the 2016 models don’t disappoint.
The Camaro SS packs the 6.2-liter LT1 V8 from the Corvette Stingray, with the same 455 hp it produces in the ‘Vette, and 455 lb-ft of torque. The Mustang GT continues with the 5.0-liter “Coyote” V8 introduced back in 2011, and now producing 435 hp and 400 lb-ft of torque.
Given that the Camaro’s Corvette-sourced V8 outguns the Mustang’s, and that the Ford’s V6 is basically a placeholder for rental cars, this round goes to the Bowtie Brigade.
Advantage: Camaro
Performance
Without any hard performance figures to go buy, it’s hard to say whether the 2016 Camaro or 2016 Mustang is the most capable car. Still, the changes made by Chevy and Ford in their most recent updates make both more well-rounded than ever before.
Rear suspension isn’t normally the stuff of headlines, but when Ford announced that it was replacing the Mustang’s solid rear axle with an independent setup, it got plenty of attention. The move may have angered some old timers, but it helped make the Mustang into a proper sports car as well as a muscle car.
Ford also offers a number of notable performance options for on-track driving. There’s a line-lock feature on the Mustang GT that locks the front brakes for easy burnouts at the drag strip, and performance packages for the GT and EcoBoost with beefed-up components for the road course.
For 2016, Ford will also introduce new high-performance Mustang variants. The Shelby GT350 and GT350R honor their legendary namesake by taking aim at Europe’s best sports cars, as well as Chevy’s Corvette.
Meanwhile, the lightened and downsized Camaro should be pretty sprightly in the bends. Its hardware cupboard isn’t bare either, thanks to available Brembo brakes and magnetic dampers for the SS model. Ford only offers the latter feature on its limited-production Shelby models.
Chevy will probably grow the list of available Camaro performance options and models, but for the now the Mustang still looks more impressive.
Advantage: Mustang
Price
Pricing information for the 2016 Camaro won’t be available until the car goes on sale this fall, but the new model should stay pretty close to the current car, which in turn virtually mirrors the Mustang.
A base Mustang with the 3.7-liter V6 starts at $24,625, including destination. The turbocharged EcoBoost four-cylinder starts at $26,125, and the V8 Mustang GT starts at $33,125.
If Chevy continues the pricing strategy it employed with the 2015 Camaro, then the new model should also fall within that roughly $24,000-$33,000 range. Of course, base price for the 2016 Camaro will buy a turbo four-cylinder engine, rather than a V6 as with the Ford.
It’s too early to declare a leader here, but the prospect of relatively affordable performance cars should be considered a win for consumers.
Advantage: Tie
Cool factor
The Camaro and Mustang are two of the coolest cars around, period. Their names are recognizable even to people who don’t really care about cars, and over the past few decades they’ve assembled legions of rabidly loyal followers.
Diehard fans will always hold their chosen favorites above all else, and it’s admittedly hard to choose between two cars that exude so much coolness.
But in the end, it has to be the Mustang. It came first, and made such a splash that GM had to build the Camaro as a reaction. Plus, Steve McQueen didn’t drive a Camaro in Bullitt.
Advantage: Mustang
Read more: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2016 Ford Mustang | Digital Trends
* Member's, Please post your favorite/ your choice ?
By Stephen Edelstein —
Related galleries
Mustang beware: 2016 Chevy Camaro SS will hit 60 in 4.0 seconds
Chevrolet announces pricing for its 2016 Camaro, starting at $26,695
Last year, Ford celebrated the 50th anniversary of its legendary “Pony Car” with the 2015 Mustang, a thoroughly reworked and reimagined model the company hopes will keep this ‘60s icon relevant well into the 21st century.
Greatness always attracts imitation, though. The original 1964 ½ Mustang created any entire “pony car” segment, which is still going strong today.
It took Chevrolet about two years to answer Ford with the first-generation 1967 Camaro, but its rival to the redesigned 2016 Mustang arrived much more quickly. Like its Ford foe, the 2016 Camaro aims for poise and efficiency as well as muscle.
So which will it be, 2016 Chevrolet Camaro, or 2016 Ford Mustang?
Exterior design
While both cars feature retro elements that nod to their long histories, the exterior designs of the Camaro and Mustang are both thoroughly modern.
The Mustang pulls an aesthetic J-turn from the previous generation, which slavishly copied the classic 1967-70 models. The 2016 model retains some signature Mustang cues like the grille, cab-rearward proportions, and segmented taillights with sequential turn signals, but everything is slickly sculpted.
That helps slim down what is actually a pretty large car, and provides better aerodynamics according to Ford. It also makes the Mustang more than just a pop culture reference.
At first glance, such a dramatic change looks much more significant than the relatively subtle changes Chevy made for the 2016 Camaro, but Ford was really playing catch up to the General Motors brand in a way.
When the Camaro was relaunched as a 2010 model, Chevy went with a more modern design than what Ford offered at the time. If nothing else, the 2016 Camaro proves the saying “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” but Chevy also runs the risk of its new model not appearing new enough.
Advantage: Mustang
Interior design, comfort, amenities
American manufacturers often get bashed for low-quality interiors, so the 2016 Camaro and Mustang have as much to prove here as they do in the more fun realm of performance.
Ford’s strategy was to bump up material quality while adding a few whimsical touches. The speedometer reads “ground speed,” and there are rocker switches on the center console that make you feel like a fighter pilot.
Chevy went in the opposite direction. Sure, the Camaro’s traditional “twin binnacle” gauge cluster remains, but you can stuff it with an available 8-inch display screen. Another 8-inch screen can be specified for the center stack to handle infotainment functions.
So which one is better? The Ford’s aeronautical theme looks cool now, but only time will tell if it stays that way, or just starts to feel cheesy. The Camaro may have gone too far down the tech route; the interior may seem less impressive on base models that don’t have the fancy screens, and the lack of mechanical parking brake takes away some of the fun of a rear-wheel drive sports car.
Advantage: Tie
Powertrain
The Camaro vs. Mustang rivalry really comes into focus under the hood. Ford 2016, powertrain lineups mirror each other, with both carmakers offering naturally-aspirated V6 and V8 and turbocharged four-cylinder engines.
Ford kicked off the four-cylinder trend with its 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine, which produces 310 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque. Its Chevy counterpart is a 2.0-liter unit with 275 hp and 295 lb-ft.
Adding a pair of cylinders, the 2016 Camaro gets an updated version of the previous car’s 3.6-liter V6, good for 335 hp and 284 lb-ft. The Mustang also continues with a holdover from its previous generation, a 3.7-liter V6 that produces 300 hp and 280 lb-ft.
Related: 2016 Ford Mustang gets hood-mounted turn signals and more
It’s worth noting that Chevy will make its four-cylinder engine standard on the Camaro, while the cheapest Mustangs ship with Ford’s V6.
Of course, muscle cars like the Camaro and Mustang are all about big, loud V8s, and the 2016 models don’t disappoint.
The Camaro SS packs the 6.2-liter LT1 V8 from the Corvette Stingray, with the same 455 hp it produces in the ‘Vette, and 455 lb-ft of torque. The Mustang GT continues with the 5.0-liter “Coyote” V8 introduced back in 2011, and now producing 435 hp and 400 lb-ft of torque.
Given that the Camaro’s Corvette-sourced V8 outguns the Mustang’s, and that the Ford’s V6 is basically a placeholder for rental cars, this round goes to the Bowtie Brigade.
Advantage: Camaro
Performance
Without any hard performance figures to go buy, it’s hard to say whether the 2016 Camaro or 2016 Mustang is the most capable car. Still, the changes made by Chevy and Ford in their most recent updates make both more well-rounded than ever before.
Rear suspension isn’t normally the stuff of headlines, but when Ford announced that it was replacing the Mustang’s solid rear axle with an independent setup, it got plenty of attention. The move may have angered some old timers, but it helped make the Mustang into a proper sports car as well as a muscle car.
Ford also offers a number of notable performance options for on-track driving. There’s a line-lock feature on the Mustang GT that locks the front brakes for easy burnouts at the drag strip, and performance packages for the GT and EcoBoost with beefed-up components for the road course.
For 2016, Ford will also introduce new high-performance Mustang variants. The Shelby GT350 and GT350R honor their legendary namesake by taking aim at Europe’s best sports cars, as well as Chevy’s Corvette.
Meanwhile, the lightened and downsized Camaro should be pretty sprightly in the bends. Its hardware cupboard isn’t bare either, thanks to available Brembo brakes and magnetic dampers for the SS model. Ford only offers the latter feature on its limited-production Shelby models.
Chevy will probably grow the list of available Camaro performance options and models, but for the now the Mustang still looks more impressive.
Advantage: Mustang
Price
Pricing information for the 2016 Camaro won’t be available until the car goes on sale this fall, but the new model should stay pretty close to the current car, which in turn virtually mirrors the Mustang.
A base Mustang with the 3.7-liter V6 starts at $24,625, including destination. The turbocharged EcoBoost four-cylinder starts at $26,125, and the V8 Mustang GT starts at $33,125.
If Chevy continues the pricing strategy it employed with the 2015 Camaro, then the new model should also fall within that roughly $24,000-$33,000 range. Of course, base price for the 2016 Camaro will buy a turbo four-cylinder engine, rather than a V6 as with the Ford.
It’s too early to declare a leader here, but the prospect of relatively affordable performance cars should be considered a win for consumers.
Advantage: Tie
Cool factor
The Camaro and Mustang are two of the coolest cars around, period. Their names are recognizable even to people who don’t really care about cars, and over the past few decades they’ve assembled legions of rabidly loyal followers.
Diehard fans will always hold their chosen favorites above all else, and it’s admittedly hard to choose between two cars that exude so much coolness.
But in the end, it has to be the Mustang. It came first, and made such a splash that GM had to build the Camaro as a reaction. Plus, Steve McQueen didn’t drive a Camaro in Bullitt.
Advantage: Mustang
Read more: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2016 Ford Mustang | Digital Trends
#3
09-30-2015, 08:23 AM
I am a Chevy girl so the Camaro is my choice.
But those Dodge Hellcats are sure some fine looking cars. It has a slight resemblance to the late 60's Camaros.
But those Dodge Hellcats are sure some fine looking cars. It has a slight resemblance to the late 60's Camaros.
#4
09-30-2015, 08:30 AM
>Thank You 4 U<
Thanks Mod Barbara for your post/contribution.
I haven't read up that much on the Hell-Cat, but they sure are demanding Big $'s.....One here in Florida sold for over $90K
I checked the net & the base price is around $63K...
I could buy a decent house for that price (lol) (Decent 2 me)
I'd be in Jail or the hospital or grave `if I had control of that much power (lol) > WoW > I'd love 2 `be able to test drive one 4-Sure...
I haven't read up that much on the Hell-Cat, but they sure are demanding Big $'s.....One here in Florida sold for over $90K
I checked the net & the base price is around $63K...
I could buy a decent house for that price (lol) (Decent 2 me)
I'd be in Jail or the hospital or grave `if I had control of that much power (lol) > WoW > I'd love 2 `be able to test drive one 4-Sure...
#5
09-30-2015, 08:42 AM
it is when you get OUT OF CONTROL when you would be in those locations!!!! 
They sure do have a hefty price tag!! 4Sure!!
#6
09-30-2015, 08:45 AM
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manchester NH
Posts: 453
Will GM ever go back to the “almost a Corvette” marketing of the Camaro
And the CTS coupe is better than either. Although it cost so much more.
And the CTS coupe is better than either. Although it cost so much more.
#7
09-30-2015, 08:54 AM
>Everyone needs More POWER or do they ?<
I think they will (?) They are putting the Corvette Engine in the Camaro's (WoW) Look 4ward to seeing the ZL1's
#8
09-30-2015, 01:25 PM
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Papillion, NE
Posts: 322
I love the black & red interior on the '16 Camaro! If I could get that on a regular RS or LT model, that'd be sweet. It sucks though that the SS is like ten thousand dollars more than the base Camaro... too rich for my measly bank account! (at least for now... ) Besides, the V8s are so powerful nowadays that you could hardly ever have enough room to let 'em really hit their stride on the street. It'd be frustrating for me to have to hold it back so much. The turbo fours are surprisingly strong engines nowadays, I think I'd be happy enough with one of them.
Anyway, the new Mustang is really decent, but I've always had a style (and attitude) preference for the Camaro (and also the Firebird/Trans Am, while it was around).
Anyway, the new Mustang is really decent, but I've always had a style (and attitude) preference for the Camaro (and also the Firebird/Trans Am, while it was around).
#9
09-30-2015, 06:13 PM
>Your Choice< Got 2 Know what's out there 4>Sure<
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...al-test-review
<LI class="ng-scope equalize" style="HEIGHT: 287px" abp="655" data-ng-repeat="item in gallery.related">
Last edited by BeachBumMike; 09-30-2015 at 06:22 PM.
