A. Unless................. this car was smacked hard in the @$$, it is NOT, NOT an '84 Monte.

A-1. wrap around taillights.

Information:
Wrap around taillights did not show up on the 4th gen Monte Carlo untill 1986 on the LS.
1987 and '88 they were used on the SS and Aerocoupe.

So unless this car received heavy damage and was fitted with later parts, it's not an '84 Monte Carlo.

 

Now your talking Space. LOL

 

...Mod `J.J., hope it made U smile : )

Hi R.J., thanks for posting your find. You have a expert eye for detail....,especially when it comes to the AweSome Chevy Monte Carlo's...I did not notice it until you pointed it out.

Thanks for sharing your knowledge and pointing `out the error, or changes to posted thread topic `Monte....

p.s. I hope you got your tooth repaired and that U R in no more pain....

 

Not dis-agreeing with you. You know would know better than I would.

Using the 4th gen VIN decoder linked in another thread, that car is supposed to be a 1984.

http://www.montecarloss.com/VIN.html

 

Okay, this car has had a pretty nasty history. Front and rear collisions.

I'll try to copy and paste the history.

Vehicle Use and EventCheck

Information Reported!

AutoCheck shows additional vehicle uses or events reported to AutoCheck for this 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Base / SS (1G1AZ37G0ER148689). This includes reported vehicle uses such as rental or lease, and events such as whether the vehicle has been reported to have had a loan/lien or a duplicate title issued. Other events show if the vehicle has a reported accident and how many calculated accidents or if it has been reported stolen or repossessed. It is recommended to have pre-owned vehicles inspected by a third party prior to purchase.

0 Event(s) Reported: 6 Vehicle uses checked:
No fleet, rental and/or lease use record
No taxi use record
No police use record
No government use record
No livery use record
No driver education record

3 Event(s) Reported: 9 Vehicle events checked:
2 Accident record(s) reported through accident data sources
No corrected title record
Duplicate title record(s)
No emission/safety inspection record
Loan/Lien record(s)
No fire damage incident record
No repossessed record
No theft record
No storm area registration/title record


Full History

Below are the historical events for this vehicle listed in chronological order. Any discrepancies will be in bold text.

Report Run Date 2010-07-02 16:18:24.369 EDT

Vehicle: 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Base / SS (1G1AZ37G0ER148689)

Event date Location Data Source Details
05/07/1986 FL Accident Source REAR IMPACT WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE(Case #:087789871)

06/02/1987 STUART, FL Motor Vehicle Dept. TITLE (Title #:0043482673)(Lien Reported)

09/07/1988 FL Accident Source FRONT IMPACT WITH ANOTHER VEHICLE(Case #:099302846)

12/04/2002 HOBE SOUND, FL Motor Vehicle Dept. TITLE (Title #:0043482673)(Lien Reported) EXCLUDED/EXEMPT

09/26/2006 MIAMI, FL Motor Vehicle Dept. TITLE (Title #:0043482673) DUPLICATE TITLE EXCLUDED/EXEMPT

 

Will this make my 3400 sound good?

 

So this would explain the newer (to the car) parts added.

 

i dont see the big deal. i'm sure some people look at stock montes and be like are they serious? they only have 15s and the boring stock paintjob?

lets not be narrowheaded now folks. just because it's different doesnt mean its bad

 

Its not the CAR that we are talking about. Its the INFO the guy posted with the car.

First of all....

Engine 383 stroker and 750 HP Carperator

Whats a 750 HP Carperator? I've heard a 750 CFM Carburetor.

8 Cylinder gas tank

I had no idea gas tanks had CYLINDERS in them.

This car and it is a must see Monster on the road as well as a eye catcher. A BEAUTY!!! Only been Driven 10 times!!!! and only to family events since being completed.

How does he know that its its a MONSTER on the road with out really opening it up and really winding up the engine. And just driven 10 times and only to family events? How far were the family events and i know how they can get out of hand. ( I'm from LA and in know what happens at FAMILY EVENTS ) Lighting up the tires and seeing how far it can do burnouts.

Thats what were really making fun of. not the car.

They built it like they wanted it to be.


Just not my style.

 

ooooo..i see