Opinions on the next step?
#22
I fell your pain in trying to make a decision. One thing I have to ask. Have you ever owned a Camaro or Firebird before? With the rear wheel drive and being light in the back, it's different driving in rain and especially in snow. I don't know how much snow you normally get but you may have to get used to fish-tailing if you have a heavy foot.
Either way they're both nice Chevys. Good luck in your decision.
Geddy
Either way they're both nice Chevys. Good luck in your decision.
Geddy
#23
I fell your pain in trying to make a decision. One thing I have to ask. Have you ever owned a Camaro or Firebird before? With the rear wheel drive and being light in the back, it's different driving in rain and especially in snow. I don't know how much snow you normally get but you may have to get used to fish-tailing if you have a heavy foot.
Either way they're both nice Chevys. Good luck in your decision.
Geddy
Either way they're both nice Chevys. Good luck in your decision.
Geddy
I am definitely leaning towards the Monte Carlo, it's an all around nicer car, more comfortable, more luxurious, and just as fast as the Camaro, just not the same room for upgrades. I'm calling the dealers for the cars now, more updates will come soon.
#24
#25
the price on that camaro is good but i personally hate the color the auto trans and the cloth interior
the ls4 monte i feel is the best way to go if it has a warranty.
it doesnt take alot for them to beat ls1 cars and you know the 3.8 is unstoppable. either way good luck.
you say dont jump on the first car you come across. and i agree. but heres a reall short story. (sorry to go off topic for a sec.) but me and my wife bought the first car from the first dealership we went to. didnt even look at another car, well we did look at another monte after we bought this one, it was an 06 ss.
As for specs, I know the 2006 Monte Carlo SS comes with the 5.3 liter V8, 0-60 time is recorded as 5.7 seconds. The 2002 Camaro Z28 comes with the 5.7 liter V8, 0-60 time (with the automatic) is recorded as 5.7 seconds.
I think since it won't cost you anything anyways, and there is no obligation to buy- I'd go and test drive them, and see which you like how it drives better.
#26
your are correct it goes by the date sold so it might not have much left on it. my car didnt sell till march of 07 though. i think theres a difference between an auto monte and an auto camaro. the monte is supposed to be a luxury sport coupe. i wouldnt want a stick in it. personally i wouldnt go out and buy an ls1 a4 car with cloth thats just me. id want the m6 that has some gearing to it from the factory with leather and t-tops and all the bells and whistles. theyre to different kinds of cars. if i was going to drag race id get the camaro. if i was going to daily drive it and have a little street fight here and there the monte is more then enough. anyway you look at it though all of these cars would be an upgrade from what the OP had so i dont think any would disappoint. one more thing id also look at the comforts that the newer car offers over the camaro. my buddy has an 02 z28 and when he got in my car he was like "wow this is way nicer then my camaro. how come my car doesnt have heated seats?" id go monte, and besides if he goes with the camaro he will be banned from the forum! he would have to head on over to ls1tech.
#27
personally i wouldnt go out and buy an ls1 a4 car with cloth thats just me.
id want the m6 that has some gearing to it from the factory with leather and t-tops and all the bells and whistles.
theyre to different kinds of cars.
anyway you look at it though all of these cars would be an upgrade from what the OP had so i dont think any would disappoint.
if i was going to daily drive it and have a little street fight here and there the monte is more then enough.
I think that even if he modded the L67 to the same power level as the LS4, that the trans on that would last longer- it would have far less power and torque out of boost- so you'd be putting it under less stress day to day.
#28
But for someone who wanted, a cheap quick drag car basis- it wouldn't be a bad choice. The manual would be more fun for sure- but the auto would be more consistent with drag racing, and you could do a high stall TC with a cam and be
I definitely see the point, they wanted a new 'muscle car' probably- they want a big V8 engine, and stripped down on the options.
Oh, I definitely agree- both coupes, but for two totally different purposes- you're going to take a big hit in any kind of racing any handling for the FWD and extra comforts- just depends what you really want though.
Definitely agree.
I'll admit- one of the things that scares me about the LS4 monte (other than the accident) is the transmission- the LS4 cars seem to have well above average number of transmission failures. I do think that even from the factory that they're pushing the limits of the 4t65. I know- I have basically the same setup in one of my DD's, but I am also prepared for when the trans goes to build it up a little.
I think that even if he modded the L67 to the same power level as the LS4, that the trans on that would last longer- it would have far less power and torque out of boost- so you'd be putting it under less stress day to day.
I definitely see the point, they wanted a new 'muscle car' probably- they want a big V8 engine, and stripped down on the options.
Oh, I definitely agree- both coupes, but for two totally different purposes- you're going to take a big hit in any kind of racing any handling for the FWD and extra comforts- just depends what you really want though.
Definitely agree.
I'll admit- one of the things that scares me about the LS4 monte (other than the accident) is the transmission- the LS4 cars seem to have well above average number of transmission failures. I do think that even from the factory that they're pushing the limits of the 4t65. I know- I have basically the same setup in one of my DD's, but I am also prepared for when the trans goes to build it up a little.
I think that even if he modded the L67 to the same power level as the LS4, that the trans on that would last longer- it would have far less power and torque out of boost- so you'd be putting it under less stress day to day.
#29
its kinda weird how like 85% of the trans failures i hear about on the ls4 cars are guys that baby the *** out of the car. the guys that drive them like filthy savages trannys seem to last longer. you are right the transmissions are extremely prone to failure. if thats the only worry then i would go out and build it up right away and then do a few serious bolt ons and leave it enjoy it.
#30
idk. i dumped dod my second week of having the car, but its strange alot of the guys that blow theres up are always saying the car never saw track time and wasnt really beaten on. then you see guys like alabama that drag the car every day and drive like maniacs and never have an issue.