General Monte Carlo Talk Talk about the Monte Carlo. Does not have to be your Monte. Can include pics and games.
View Poll Results: Prefer the L67 naked or covered???
Covered with the plenum
11
64.71%
Naked as a jaybird
6
35.29%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Opinions - Naked or Covered???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2010 | 08:38 PM
  #11  
davidk67's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 137
From: Worcester, MA
Default

When I first got this car, I really liked the engine cover, but as I have seen more and more mods to the engine, the attention to detail in things like AN fuel lines, chroming of parts, coat/polish of the supercharger cover, and other aesthetics to the engine bay, the more I like the idea of going without the cover.

Plus, I think when I add the intercooler to my car, the 2.25 raise is gonna wreck being able to keep the cover on it anyways.

And perhaps the cover keeps hot air under it and having it off helps circulation under the hood.

Lastly, I was at a car show tonight here in Shrewsbury MA and I really enjoyed seeing all the custom cars and rods that had all their work on display - and here mine was with just a cover and some shiny brightwork diagonal braces and dogbones.
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #12  
#2726's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 364
Default

this post is WORTHLESS without pics!!! Let's have some!

without a plenum cover, my supercharged 3800 V6:




This the same engine WITH a plenum cover:







Granted SOME cars look better without covers. My 08 ROUSH Mustang can't fit a plenum cover and looks FABULOUS without. Other vintage and classic cars look beautiful without any coverings so you can actually see what's working, and some of these newer cars you can't see a thing! It's all a matter of taste and a matter of what automobile it actuallly is...
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 01:01 AM
  #13  
red04montels's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- September 2010
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,380
From: Wisconsin
15 Year Member
Default

naked!!!

oh, engines, covered unless you have it powdercoated or heavily modded, i like that cover!
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 08:15 AM
  #14  
jarheadbobandmax's Avatar
Photobucket
Monte Of The Month -- November 2009
3 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,123
From: northeastern Illinios
Default

Originally Posted by trewyn15
naked!!!

oh, engines, covered unless you have it powdercoated or heavily modded, i like that cover!


trunk ;id looks a bit bare Mitch
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 08:52 AM
  #15  
bumpin96monte's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,460
15 Year Member
Default

I like the cover myself...By now, most of the superchargers are dark and gray and just discolored. If you have an s/c that's chromed out, or powdercoated a different color, then it looks nice.
X10- I don't think it would've been as bad if the SC had the same finish all across it- but they've got a different finish on the case and snout from the factory which makes it look like someone took the snout off to paint it, but didn't have time to paint the case too.

Even if the engine looks like crap, I just dont know why somone would want to look at some piece of plastic instead of the power maker??
IMO, because the engine cover gave the engineers free reign to forget about aesthetics, and just throw stuff wherever they wanted (as with just about any engine) regardless of how it looks.

I can see it just looking at the above pics- with the cover on, everything in the engine bay is relatively clean and organized- then you scroll up a few pics, and there is a spaghetti mess of twisted wires, hoses, lines, etc running every which way sitting on top of the SC.
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #16  
CMC's Avatar
CMC
10 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
Default

Plastic is a horrible material to be attached to an engine. The NA intakes of the 3800 are proof.
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 10:44 AM
  #17  
mak330's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 924
From: OHIO
Default

is the 3800 cover hard to take off?


all that holds mine on is the oil tube, and then it just pops off.
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 02:01 PM
  #18  
red04montels's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- September 2010
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,380
From: Wisconsin
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by jarheadbobandmax
trunk ;id looks a bit bare Mitch
yeah it does lol, im gonna get a panel i think i just need money and a place to ship to and an idea of what i want ha
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 05:55 PM
  #19  
jeffsmonte's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 207
From:
Default

Everyone's first L67 mod should be an engine cover delete! Haha. Unless its awesomely repainted like #2627 has.
 
Old May 9, 2010 | 06:09 PM
  #20  
bumpin96monte's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,460
15 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by CMC
Plastic is a horrible material to be attached to an engine. The NA intakes of the 3800 are proof.
Might I ask why you say that? Its cheaper than a metal intake- and offers more performance due to its heat insulating properties. Same reason why the LSx engine guys tend to stick with plastic even when they upgrade.

There is no reason it has to be metal- its not structural, only thing is has to do is hold up the throttle body, and be strong enough to not warp under normal engine operating conditions. IMO, all of the problems I've heard of on different cars with plastic intakes have been design problems/engineering failures- not problems due to the use of plastics.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.