General Monte Carlo Talk Talk about the Monte Carlo. Does not have to be your Monte. Can include pics and games.

Is it even possible...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 02-07-2012, 09:39 PM
537's Avatar
537
537 is offline
1 Year Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Redwood Falls, MN
Posts: 158
Default

I have got up to 37 mpg on the highway in my car. Only thing done to it (as far as I know) is a K&N intake.
 
  #12  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:26 AM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central Oklahoma
Posts: 3,635
Default

I found that I get a few mpg better between 70 and 80 than I do around 60. 2300 RPM is about the ideal cruising RPM for a 3800.
 
  #13  
Old 02-08-2012, 07:57 AM
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 162
Default

I guess I need to try changing my plugs/wires. With my 05 3400 the most I've managed to get is right around 23-24 mostly highway. City I normally get 18-19. Only mods so far are l67 coils, exhaust, and fender-well intake (did help by about .5 mpg, give or take..)

I wonder if MPG is something that's effected by how the engine is broken in? Doesn't make sense that a bunch of people with the same car get such different results.
 
  #14  
Old 02-08-2012, 09:01 AM
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar

Monte Of The Month -- August 2014
15 Year Member
10 Year Member5 Year Member3 Year Member1 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southeast PA
Posts: 25,136
Default

Originally Posted by SupplySgt
Granted, it was a stick so less driveline loss but keep in mind the 96 Camaro ECM was non-flashable, so I could fine tune things.
The drivetrain loss on these cars is about the same 20%, it's still really terrible.
 
  #15  
Old 02-08-2012, 03:19 PM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central Oklahoma
Posts: 3,635
Default

I want to know how it's still 20% driveline loss. Was it that terribly made? General rule of thumb is 15% for manuals, 20-25% for RWD automatic, around 30% for FWD automatic, and around 40% for AWD.
 
  #16  
Old 02-08-2012, 04:01 PM
Leprechaun93's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- June 2013
Monte Of The Month -- December 2015
5 Year Member
3 Year Member1 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Middletown, NY
Posts: 10,385
Default

It baffles me that 3800 owners are getting such high mpg's. I struggle to achieve 25mpg anymorw with my 3100.
 
  #17  
Old 02-08-2012, 04:04 PM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central Oklahoma
Posts: 3,635
Default

Just goes to show how good of a design the 3800 was. Durable, efficient, powerful for a V6 of the era, especially in S/C form.
 
  #18  
Old 02-08-2012, 05:29 PM
Leprechaun93's Avatar
Monte Of The Month -- June 2013
Monte Of The Month -- December 2015
5 Year Member
3 Year Member1 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Middletown, NY
Posts: 10,385
Default

Indeed, i would just think with a smaller engine i should atleast be able to get a little bit closer. Normally you'd think the bigger engine would have less mpg than a smaller one
 
  #19  
Old 02-08-2012, 05:36 PM
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hopewell, PA
Posts: 2,382
Default

I'm not getting 30-40 mpg out of my 3800 either and it runs fine with no known problems. I'm at a loss.
 
  #20  
Old 02-08-2012, 05:37 PM
BlackRainSS's Avatar
3 Year Member1 Year Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,868
Default

I'm pretty shocked at some of the numbers myself. I mean to make it clear he is by no means doing over 65 or under 60. His car had NO tune and was a DD with a lot of in town driving. I thought possibly with some mods yes but the way he stomps on it and his in town burn outs combined with his other driving skills I thought it no way possible.
 


Quick Reply: Is it even possible...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.