Monte Carlo Forum - Monte Carlo Enthusiast Forums

Monte Carlo Forum - Monte Carlo Enthusiast Forums (https://montecarloforum.com/forum/)
-   Off Topic (https://montecarloforum.com/forum/off-topic-5/)
-   -   ~> 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco ? (https://montecarloforum.com/forum/off-topic-5/%7E-2013-chevrolet-malibu-eco-32075/)

Space Nov 11, 2011 07:41 AM

~> 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco ?
 
http://media.caranddriver.com/images...-s-429x262.jpg<!-- hero image goes here -->Prototype Drive
arrow<HGROUP>2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco

We drive a preproduction Malibu and offer preproduction opinions.

</HGROUP></HEADER>
  • September 2011
  • BY JOHN PHILLIPS
  • MULTIPLE PHOTOGRAPHERS<!-- class="multiple" added when multiple authors or photographers -->
  • A.J. MUELLER AND
  • THE MANUFACTURER

http://media.caranddriver.com/images...s-original.jpg



Hard to believe, but what we have here is the eighth-generation Malibu, a car on sale 35 years and, uh, spanning six decades. It has historically been a kind of peripatetic approximation of Midwestern mobile civility—here today, gone tomorrow, then suddenly back again—and it was surely facing another passenger-pigeon demise when GM startlingly imbued the Malibu with all of the stellar credentials found in its sister, the Saturn Aura. Faster than we could say, “GM did what?” the previous-gen Malibu landed on our 2008 10Best list.
The first of the brand-new Malibus, slated to appear in the spring of 2012, is the Eco, featuring GM’s “light electrification of a traditional powertrain,” a.k.a. eAssist. GM doesn’t want us calling it a hybrid, although “hybrid” sure rolls off the tongue easier than “light electrification.” The system includes an all-in-one motor/generator that replaces the alternator, connected to 32 lithium-ion cells jammed into a 65-pound battery pack located aft of the rear seat. Via a rubber belt, the electric motor/generator—built in China, with no permanent magnets—contributes a bonus 15 horses to the crankshaft, mostly under wide-open throttle. Fun fact: The belt has a duty life of 75,000 miles. The Eco’s gas engine displaces 2.4 liters and produces 182 horsepower. Combined, engine and motor are expected to deliver 26 mpg in the city and 38 on the highway. We shall see.
Next summer, the more traditional gas-only Malibus will arrive—LS, LT, and LTZ—and they’ll all be powered by a brand-new 2.5-liter Ecotec producing an estimated 190 ponies. If so, that’s a healthy 21-hp nudge beyond the Malibu’s existing inline-four. By the way, GM is so certain you’re freaked out over fuel prices that no V-6 will be offered. That’s a bold wager.
<TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=1><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>http://media.caranddriver.com/images...s-original.jpg



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
We didn’t drive a Malibu with the new engine. It wasn’t ready. Nor was GM positive about its power output. Nor of its fuel economy, although “more than 30 mpg highway” was a stated goal. Instead, what we drove was a preproduction Malibu Eco with 17-inch tires and an LTZ-level cabin that wasn’t finished. Price? GM didn’t know that, either. Hey, sometimes you make the trailer for a movie before you make the movie, okay?
The Malibu’s upscale cabin remains upscale, awash in contrasting colors and classy stitching, as well as so-called basketball graining, which sounds awful but contributes to dimension and depth. So, too, do new decorative lateral dashboard “vanes” that glow with ice-blue ambient lighting. The radio’s touch screen cleverly flips up to reveal a six-inch-deep bin that’s big enough to swallow a cell phone and abag of Fritos. The front seat cushions are firm and nicely scalloped. For two folks, back-seat comfort is excellent, with the Malibu’s wider front and rear tracks resulting in a 3.2-inch gain in shoulder room.
On GM’s ride-and-handling track in Milford, Michigan, what we first noticed is that the new Malibu is extraordinarily quiet, that its structure feels even more solid than before, and that you can’t feel the electric motor kicking on or off. The ride is firm but appropriate to the market, and body motions are adequately damped. At light throttle, there’s no telling how many cylinders are at play. At rest, there are supposed to be zero cylinders at play, thanks to the automatic stop-start function, but our test car never turned itself off. Under WOT, the Ecotec still evinces a high-frequency thrum that lays bare its humble four-ishness, and it will be thrumming aplenty because this new Malibu feels heavy, asking for a lot of throttle to get out of the blocks. How heavy? GM doesn’t know that, either. Or at least isn’t telling. The car certainly feels no quicker to 60 mph than the 8.7 seconds required for the Malibu LT we sampled in March 2008. Anyone yet pining for the abandoned V-6’s 252 horses?
<TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=1><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>http://media.caranddriver.com/images...s-original.jpg



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
The Malibu’s ZF electrically assisted power steering is low on feedback, but the weighting is fine and so is tracking. Here’s good news: The regenerative braking that helps charge the batteries reveals itself not at all in pedal feel. No pulses, no soft spots—just firm, linear travel. Here’s bad news: The battery pack rests between the rear wheel wells and is cooled by a fan in the rear parcel shelf. It draws air from the cockpit. What with all of its tubes and snorkels, the thing reduces trunk space by two cubic feet, though the useful space is still one cubic foot larger than the 2012 Malibu’s. What’s more, the fan emits a jet-like whoosh when the engine is stoked with major throttle. Rear passengers will ask, “Are we taking off now?” At least front passengers can’t hear it.
Every Malibu is equipped with a Hydra-Matic 6T40 with a manual shift mode that is operated via a squishy rocker atop the shift knob. It would be a lot more convenient to bang away at the whole shift lever, but maybe Malibu drivers view that as hostile.
GM plans to sell the new Malibu on six continents, assembling it in four factories: two in the U.S., one in China, and one in South Korea. The car certainly looks the part with its bulked-up, I’m-about-to-pop-a-vein muscularity. Yet it boasts a Cd of 0.29, down from the previous Malibu’s 0.35, a huge gain.
Of course, don’t take any of this too seriously. We drove the Malibu Eco maybe 10 miles on the very test track where it was developed. It ought to feel good there, right?
As you read the following sentence, mimic Alec Baldwin’s deepest, darkest, most threatening voice, as if he’s narrating the trailer for an action movie: “In a world gone mad with power, there’s one Malibu, a Malibu that runs deep and won’t have a V-6 and doesn’t know anyone in Malibu. It’s a Malibu that’s ready for action—quiet action—from Muskegon to Miami but mostly in Muskegon. And if it doesn’t advance the chains as far down America’s sidelines as its predecessor, neither does it fumble. It’s your Malibu—America’s Malibu—but also China’s Malibu. Jeepers.View Photo Gallery
<TABLE class=default border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=1><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>http://media.caranddriver.com/images...s-original.jpg



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><NAV class=mod>PHOTOS (20)
Specifications >



VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan

ESTIMATED BASE PRICE: $24,500

ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 16-valve 2.4-liter inline-4, 182 hp, 172 lb-ft; AC induction motor/generator, 15 hp, 79 lb-ft; combined system, 182 hp

TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic with manual shifting mode

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 107.8 in Length: 191.3 in
Width: 73.0 in Height: 57.6 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 3600 lb

PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 8.3 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 23.0 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 16.4 sec
Top Speed: 118 mph
FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST):
EPA city/highway driving: 26/38 mpg

Leprechaun93 Nov 11, 2011 08:37 AM

looking good in my opinion. I dont really like the current malibu that much. My only thought is it seems it took the rear from the camaro though:rolleyes:

ChibiBlackSheep Nov 11, 2011 09:12 AM

I kind of miss the older Malibu rear.

Taz Nov 11, 2011 08:16 PM

I think I see what GM is trying to do. And I have to give them credit for trying to boost sales. Use a well known name plate to introduce your latest electric hybrid. Then add Camaro-style tail lights to imply speed and performance.

Is this supposed to be GM's version of the Prius? A Malibu for everybody's taste? Just my opinion, but GM has absoutely destroyed the reputation of the Malibu name. Gone are the days of the "Bad `Bu" reputation. I sincerely hope GM doesn't start ruining the Monte name like this. Like turning it into a 4 cylinder pizza delivery wagon or something.

03JGMonte Nov 11, 2011 11:02 PM

I havnt been a fan of the Malibu for along time now & deff not a fan of this one either

Taz Nov 12, 2011 08:25 AM

I have to think if a new concept is going to stand up and be successful, it should be able to sell successfully with a completely new name. It shouldn't have to rely on the success of a nameplate from the past.

Like the Volt for example. If it's such a great concept and such a great car, it should be a success with the name Volt. They shouldn't have to call it something like the Pontiac Grand Prix, in order for people to buy it.

oneslowmonte Nov 12, 2011 11:51 AM

I really like it!

Zen Nov 12, 2011 03:23 PM

Looks aren't too bad but i haven't liked any malibu made after the early 80's g-bodys

mrl390 Nov 12, 2011 05:08 PM

I cant help but wonder if instead of using the smaller motor = better MPG philosophy, if they would develope a more efficient 6 banger for the bigger cars like the Malibu and maybe see better MPG than the current 4 cylinders are producing. Underpowering a large car doesnt always mean you can increase the efficiency. If you have to lay into the throttle farther and more often to move the beast around you are defeating the purpose.

JuniorCar Nov 12, 2011 05:29 PM

I like that rear quarter shot and the tail lights. But the squarely profile side shot looks like crap. I dunno - I don't hate this car. I'd consider it or the previous generation


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands