Pully size?
#1
Pully size?
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <wontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> 3800 2005 Monte S/C SS
Is a 3.0 or 3.2 pulley size reasonable for these mods:
Stage 2 intercooler - with upper & lower intake
1 ¾ TOG extreme headers with TOG downpipe; glas pack as resonator, factory mufflers;
CAI
XP Hot cam – & supporting hardware; stock heads
I’ll probably need some colder plugs, I’m sure I’ve seen them here somewhere…
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->
Is a 3.0 or 3.2 pulley size reasonable for these mods:
Stage 2 intercooler - with upper & lower intake
1 ¾ TOG extreme headers with TOG downpipe; glas pack as resonator, factory mufflers;
CAI
XP Hot cam – & supporting hardware; stock heads
I’ll probably need some colder plugs, I’m sure I’ve seen them here somewhere…
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->
#5
I have a 3.0 on right now; still learning about tuning; I have noticed even the slightest amount of throttle & my boost needle jumps... With the proper tune, would a 3.6 or stock pulley provide better fuel economy than a 3.0 or 3.2
(eventually I want to have a few tunes & setups, one for the strip & one for them long road trips) :-)
(eventually I want to have a few tunes & setups, one for the strip & one for them long road trips) :-)
#6
Honestly this may sound contradicting but it happened to me. My fuel economy was horrible after dropping sizes on my pully because the stock injectors were working at 99% which is not good on a daily basis. So I upgraded to #60 and my fuel economy got a little better. Not as good as with sock pullry but better then the stock injectors with a smaller pulley.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crete
Engine/Transmission/Performance Adders
2
04-27-2009 11:47 PM
dan
Engine/Transmission/Performance Adders
7
10-13-2008 05:55 PM
livinlow
Monte Carlo Repair Help
2
03-22-2007 08:52 PM